Search results

From a long list of plays entered into the Stationers' Register by Humphrey Moseley on 9 September, 1 :A Knaue in Print, or One for another"

====To playwrights in Philip Henslowe's diary==== | Receaued of m^r Henshlowe in behalfe of the Company ||}

====Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary==== ...for differing opinions on whether Henslowe's entries represent one or two plays on Godfrey of Boulogne).

...are playlists compiled by stationers or others knowledgable about holdings in personal or institutional libraries. This page provides access to transcrip [[Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript | Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript (c.1677-1703)]]

...els was descended from Queen Anne's Men and continued to perform their old plays, so that "''Grammercy Wit'' may have been written long before 1621" (5:1344 ...] (entry 1984) observes that "the title seems to have been a phrase spoken in grateful acknowledgement of one's native intelligence". He thus suggests th

==== Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary ==== ...his execution in 1521 for opposing Wolsey. The third Duke is a character in Shakespeare and Fletcher's ''Henry VIII''.

===[[Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript]]=== The fiftieth and fifty-first items on '''[[Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript]]''' are:

Hill's list is reproduced and discussed [[Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript|'''here''']]. The tenth item on it is: ...that there is a "The" to be supplied to the title, but no "The" is present in the one extant record. Adams adds that it is "hardly plausible" to actuall

| [[All's One, or Four Plays in One]]||[[1605]]||[[:category:King's|King's]]

...eement was complete, and Henslowe probably retained the manuscript, having in effect bought it. :next w^ch shall be in the yeare of our Lord

...who performed the one extant Brome/Heywood collaboration (see below). But in his ''ODNB'' article on Brome, Martin Butler adds that both this play and ' ...d, secondly, that Brome and Heywood wrote it. However, it should be borne in mind that the wording is not entirely conclusive on either of these points.

Although a lost play by Rowley was entitled ''[[A Knave in Print, or One for Another]]'', Bentley states that "there is no adequate re ...that the two ''Knaves'' plays may have been revivals of the two ''Knack'' plays of the 1590s, ''A Knack to Know a Knave'' and ''A Knack to Know an Honest M

...Humphrey Moseley entered on the Stationers' Register a list of twenty-six plays, including: Among the manuscript plays which Warburton claimed had been destroyed by his cook are listed:

..., ''RES'' 479). Chambers believes it “most likely that the lists represent plays which the Revels Office had at some time or times under consideration for p ===Hill’s List of Early Plays in Manuscript===

...se documented. Entries for the relevant plays discuss issues of chronology in detail. | [[Anon.]]||[[Five Plays in One (Admiral's)]] ||[[Admiral’s]]

...these Books following are sold by ''Henry Marsh'' at the ''Princes Arms'' in ''Chancery-Lane''". Under "Incomparable Comedies, and Tragedies, written by ...e of a series of editions of this well-known language manual. The book is in dialogue-form, although it would still seem unscrupulous to call it a comed

Archer's list is reproduced in full '''[[Archer%27s_List|here]]'''. Comedy, or tragedy (seemingly listed as both in 1656 record)

A cast list for the play is recorded in British Library, Additional MS 38599, a manuscript miscellany by Richard Sh ...^th men & boyes vpon Monday, Twesdaie, Wednesdaie, and Thursdaie in whitsonne weeke; the names of the plaiers was these =

...ess and Now Printing" which were advertised by the printer Nathaniel Brook in E. Phillips, ''The New World of English Words'' (1658). This is one of at <blockquote>Books in the Presse, and ready for Printing.<br>

...t be demonstrated that even a majority of the six were old Salisbury Court plays" (3.70). ...o have written seven new plays for the King's Revels/Queen Henrietta's Men in the period 1635-39. All seven of these seem to be already accounted for wi