Bristow Merchant: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
===The Office-Book of Sir Henry Herbert===
===The Office-Book of Sir Henry Herbert===


J. O. Halliwell-Phillips transcribed a number of Sir Henry Herbert's licensing records and compiled them in various scrapbooks now held at the Folger Shakespeare Library. Amongst them is the following transcription of plays from September 1624, which includes:<br><br>
J. O. Halliwell-Phillips transcribed a number of Sir Henry Herbert's licensing records and compiled them in various scrapbooks now held at the Folger Shakespeare Library. Amongst them is the following transcription of plays from 1624, which includes:<br><br>
<blockquote>For the P: comp: A new P. call: The Bristow Marchant writt: by Forde & Decker 22 Oct <sub>^</sub> <sup>1624 1 li.</sup></blockquote>
<blockquote>For the P: comp: A new P. call: The Bristow Marchant writt: by Forde & Decker 22 Oct <sub>^</sub> <sup>1624 1 li.</sup></blockquote>


Line 23: Line 23:
==Theatrical Provenance==
==Theatrical Provenance==


The Prince's company. Harbage, working without the benefit of the Burn transcript (see above), presumably interpreted the "P Company" of the Halliwell-Phillips transcript as meaning "Palsgrave's" instead.
The Prince's company. Harbage, working without the benefit of the Burn transcript (see above), presumably interpreted the "P: Comp:" of the Halliwell-Phillips transcript as meaning "Palsgrave's company" instead.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Line 35: Line 35:
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
It is basically impossible to ascertain which merchant from Bristol, historical or fictional, might be the subject of this lost play. However, it may be worth considering the possibility (see [[#Critical Commentary|'''Critical Commentary''']] below) that the "Bristow Merchant" of Dekker's own subsequent text, ''Penny-wis pound foolish or, a Bristow diamond, set in two rings, and both crack'd'' (1631) may have also been the titular character of the Dekker and Ford play of 1624.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
(Information welcome).
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
'''Fleay''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/abiographicalch01fleagoog#page/n245/mode/1up/ ''BCED'' 1.233]) lumps this title together with the "[[Bristow Tragedy]]" by [[John Day|Day]] ([[1602]]) purely on the basis of the similar names; a fact that '''Chambers''' notes with disapproval (3.304).
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
'''Hunt''' followed earlier critics in assuming the "P: comp:" of Halliwell-Phillips' transcription of licensing records meant "Palsgrave's" not "Prince's" (178). She drew attention to W. Bang's critical edition of ''Penny-Wise, Pound-Foolish'' (which appeared in ''Materialien zur Kunde des älteren Englischen Dramas'' [1908]), in which Bang suggested that there might be some connection between this lost play and Dekker's novella, even though the latter was not published until 1630. Noting the subtitle, "A Bristow Diamond set in two Rings, and both Crack'd. Profitable for Married Men, pleasant for young men, and a rare example for all good Women", Hunt summarise the novella as follows:
<blockquote>It tells the rather dreary story of a "Bristow" merchant, who after an extended career of profligacy and an attempt at murder, is finally ransomed and lovingly received by the wife he has twice betrayed --"a rare example for all good Women." He repents, and reduced to poverty, they live in a small shop until the wife's penny, which was all the venture she would entrust to her husband in his pound-foolish days, and which he had given to a subordinate, returns with an increment of many pounds and is the means of restoring prosperity to them. We are told that the story is true but that the names of the characters have been changed. ([https://archive.org/stream/cu31924100210982#page/n209/mode/2up Hunt 188])</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
(Information welcome)
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==


<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Dekker, Thomas. ''Penny-wis pound foolish or, a Bristow diamond, set in two rings, and both crack'd Profitable for married men, pleasant for young men, and a rare example for all good women. At London : Printed by A. M. for Edward Blackmore, and are to be sould in Pauls Church-yard, at the signe of the Angell, 1631.</div>
 
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Hunt, Mary Leland. ''Thomas Dekker: A Study''. NY: Columbia UP, 1911. ([https://archive.org/details/cu31924100210982 Internet Archive])</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>
<br>
 
<br>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>
<br>
 
 
Site created and maintained by [[David McInnis]], University of Melbourne; updated 28 March 2016.
Site created and maintained by [[David McInnis]], University of Melbourne; updated 28 March 2016.
[[category:all]][[category:David McInnis]][[category:Fortune]]Category:Prince Charles's (I)
[[category:all]][[category:David McInnis]][[category:Fortune]][[Category:Prince Charles's (I)]]

Revision as of 14:38, 27 March 2016

John Ford & Thomas Dekker (1624)


Historical Records

The Office-Book of Sir Henry Herbert

J. O. Halliwell-Phillips transcribed a number of Sir Henry Herbert's licensing records and compiled them in various scrapbooks now held at the Folger Shakespeare Library. Amongst them is the following transcription of plays from 1624, which includes:

For the P: comp: A new P. call: The Bristow Marchant writt: by Forde & Decker 22 Oct ^ 1624 1 li.

Bristow Merchant sml.jpg

(Folger Shakespeare Library, MS W.b.156 ("Fortune"), p149. Reproduce by permission of the Folger Shakespeare Library)



In 1996, N. W. Bawcutt published new records deriving from hitherto overlooked transcriptions and cuttings from the Ord manuscript, made by its previous owner (i.e. previous to Halliwell-Phillipps) the nineteenth-century scholar Jacob Henry Burn (Beinecke Library, Osborn d1):

The Bristow Merchant. a New Play ^written by Ford and Decker alld for Prince's Company 22 Oct 1624      1li

Burn Transcript 1467725 Bristow Merchant sml.jpg

(Jacob Henry Burn, "Collection towards forming a history of the now obsolete office of the Master of the Revells", [1874]. James Marshall and Marie-Louise Osborn Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Reproduced with permission).




Theatrical Provenance

The Prince's company. Harbage, working without the benefit of the Burn transcript (see above), presumably interpreted the "P: Comp:" of the Halliwell-Phillips transcript as meaning "Palsgrave's company" instead.


Probable Genre(s)

Comedy (?) (Harbage)


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

It is basically impossible to ascertain which merchant from Bristol, historical or fictional, might be the subject of this lost play. However, it may be worth considering the possibility (see Critical Commentary below) that the "Bristow Merchant" of Dekker's own subsequent text, Penny-wis pound foolish or, a Bristow diamond, set in two rings, and both crack'd (1631) may have also been the titular character of the Dekker and Ford play of 1624.


References to the Play

(Information welcome).


Critical Commentary

Fleay (BCED 1.233) lumps this title together with the "Bristow Tragedy" by Day (1602) purely on the basis of the similar names; a fact that Chambers notes with disapproval (3.304).

Hunt followed earlier critics in assuming the "P: comp:" of Halliwell-Phillips' transcription of licensing records meant "Palsgrave's" not "Prince's" (178). She drew attention to W. Bang's critical edition of Penny-Wise, Pound-Foolish (which appeared in Materialien zur Kunde des älteren Englischen Dramas [1908]), in which Bang suggested that there might be some connection between this lost play and Dekker's novella, even though the latter was not published until 1630. Noting the subtitle, "A Bristow Diamond set in two Rings, and both Crack'd. Profitable for Married Men, pleasant for young men, and a rare example for all good Women", Hunt summarise the novella as follows:

It tells the rather dreary story of a "Bristow" merchant, who after an extended career of profligacy and an attempt at murder, is finally ransomed and lovingly received by the wife he has twice betrayed --"a rare example for all good Women." He repents, and reduced to poverty, they live in a small shop until the wife's penny, which was all the venture she would entrust to her husband in his pound-foolish days, and which he had given to a subordinate, returns with an increment of many pounds and is the means of restoring prosperity to them. We are told that the story is true but that the names of the characters have been changed. (Hunt 188)




For What It's Worth

(Information welcome)


Works Cited

Dekker, Thomas. Penny-wis pound foolish or, a Bristow diamond, set in two rings, and both crack'd Profitable for married men, pleasant for young men, and a rare example for all good women. At London : Printed by A. M. for Edward Blackmore, and are to be sould in Pauls Church-yard, at the signe of the Angell, 1631.
Hunt, Mary Leland. Thomas Dekker: A Study. NY: Columbia UP, 1911. (Internet Archive)




Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 28 March 2016.