Two Shapes: Difference between revisions
David Nicol (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m (added screenshot from Henslowe-Alleyn) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Historical records== | ==Historical records== | ||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; margin: .46em 0 0 .2em;" | |||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" | |||
| valign="top" |[[Image:Two shapes.jpg|link=http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/images/MSS-7/106r.html]]<!-- | |||
--><br /> See the relevant MS entry in the ''Henslowe-Alleyn Digitisation Project'' site [http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/images/MSS-7/106r.html here]. | |||
|} | |||
The play appears in Henslowe's diary as follows: | The play appears in Henslowe's diary as follows: | ||
Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
:& webester & mondaye in fulle paymente for | :& webester & mondaye in fulle paymente for | ||
:ther playe called too shapes the some of iij<sup>lb</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n227/mode/1up Greg I, 167]) | :ther playe called too shapes the some of iij<sup>lb</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n227/mode/1up Greg I, 167]) | ||
<br><br> | |||
Malone recorded the title as "The Two Harpies" and Collier as "too harpes", noting that the second word might also be ''hapes'', ''hopes'' or ''harpes''. However, W.W. Greg read it as "Two Shapes": | Malone recorded the title as "The Two Harpies" and Collier as "too harpes", noting that the second word might also be ''hapes'', ''hopes'' or ''harpes''. However, W.W. Greg read it as "Two Shapes": | ||
:There can be no question as to the letters ''hapes'', but there is something before them. This looks at first sight like a ''c'', but I am convinced on examination that it is really an ''s'', of which the tail is almost invisible. ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n293/mode/1up Greg I, 233]; [http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/images/MSS-7/106r.html cf. the facsimile at Henslowe-Alleyn]) | :There can be no question as to the letters ''hapes'', but there is something before them. This looks at first sight like a ''c'', but I am convinced on examination that it is really an ''s'', of which the tail is almost invisible. <br>([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n293/mode/1up Greg I, 233]; [http://www.henslowe-alleyn.org.uk/images/MSS-7/106r.html cf. the facsimile at Henslowe-Alleyn]) | ||
<br><br> | |||
Greg notes that the record is not in Henslowe's hand, and may be Downton's.([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n293/mode/1up Greg I, 233]) | Greg notes that the record is not in Henslowe's hand, and may be Downton's.([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n293/mode/1up Greg I, 233]) | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 04:48, 15 May 2011
Thomas Dekker, Michael Drayton, Thomas Middleton, Anthony Munday and John Webster (1602)
Historical records
File:Two shapes.jpg See the relevant MS entry in the Henslowe-Alleyn Digitisation Project site here. |
The play appears in Henslowe's diary as follows:
- Lent vnto Thomas downton the 29 of maye
- 1602 to paye Thomas dickers drayton mydellton
- & webester & mondaye in fulle paymente for
- ther playe called too shapes the some of iijlb (Greg I, 167)
Malone recorded the title as "The Two Harpies" and Collier as "too harpes", noting that the second word might also be hapes, hopes or harpes. However, W.W. Greg read it as "Two Shapes":
- There can be no question as to the letters hapes, but there is something before them. This looks at first sight like a c, but I am convinced on examination that it is really an s, of which the tail is almost invisible.
(Greg I, 233; cf. the facsimile at Henslowe-Alleyn)
Greg notes that the record is not in Henslowe's hand, and may be Downton's.(Greg I, 233)
Theatrical provenance
The payment to Thomas Downton indicates that the play was written for the Admiral's Men.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known.
Probable Genre(s)
Unknown.
Critical Commentary
W.W. Greg identified this play with the lost Caesar's Fall, recorded in the diary one week earlier; he argued that the correspondence between the dramatists and the payments make this identification "beyond doubt" (Greg II, 222). Subsequent commentators have followed suit.
Doris Feldman and Kurt Tetzeli von Rosador (who follow Greg in assuming that Two Shapes was about Julius Caesar) argue that the word "shape" probably refers to disguises (OED, 7); they note that Middleton commonly associates the word with duplicity and suggest that it refers to Caesar's legendary ability to dissimulate (329).
References to the Play
None known.
For What It's Worth
While the word "shapes" could certainly refer to disguises, it may be worth noting that it could also refer to ghosts (OED, 6.c.). If the play was about Caesar, the title may thus refer to spectral versions of Caesar and/or other characters, perhaps inspired by the ghost in Shakespeare's play.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by David Nicol, Dalhousie University; updated 14 May, 2011.