Stepmother's Tragedy, The: Difference between revisions
|Line 69:||Line 69:|
== Theatrical Provenance ==
== Theatrical Provenance ==
The Admiral's Men paid Thomas Dekker and Henry Chettle £6 in the fall of 1599 for
The Admiral's Men paid Thomas Dekker and Henry Chettle £6 in the fall of 1599 for The Stepmother's Tragedy.At the time they were still at the Rose, though they would move to the Fortune the following fall. Across Maid Lane from the Rose, the Chamberlain's Men were in their opening season at the newly-built Globe.
== Probable Genre(s) ==
== Probable Genre(s) ==
Revision as of 12:43, 18 November 2020
To playwrights in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 63v (Greg, I.100)
Lent vnto Thomas Deckyers the 24th } pd of July 1599 at the Requeste of Samvell } xs Rowly & Thomas downton in earnest of } a Boocke called stepmothers tragedy ... }
Fol. 64 (Greg I.111)
Lent vnto harey Chettell & Thd the 23 } of aguste 1599 in earneste of his playe called } xxs the stepmothers tragedie the some of ... }
Lent vnto wm Birde Thomas downton & Jewbey } the 25 of aguste 1599 to paye harye Chettell for } xxs his Boocke called the stepmothers tragedie some }
Fol. 65 (Greg I.113)
this 14 October 1599 } Receaued by me Robt shaa of phillip Henslowe } to pay H. Chettle [f] in full paiment of a booke } 4li Called the stepmothers tragedy for the vse } of the Company iiijli J say Receaved ... }
The Admiral's Men paid Thomas Dekker and Henry Chettle £6 in the fall of 1599 for "The Stepmother's Tragedy." At the time they were still at the Rose, though they would move to the Fortune the following fall. Across Maid Lane from the Rose, the Chamberlain's Men were in their opening season at the newly-built Globe.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
See "For What It's Worth," below.
References to the Play
Greg explains that the initial payment to Dekker for 10s. was cancelled. He notes further that "[a] play called the Cruelty of a Stepmother was acted at Richmond on 28 Dec. 1578 by the then Chamberlain's men," but he sees "no reason to suppose any connection with the present piece" (II.204, Item #178). He does not mention the ballad (see below), the sub-title of which is closer to the 1578 play-title than to the 1599 one.
Knutson suggests that, if the ballad called "The Lady Isabella's Tragedy; or The Step-Mother's Cruelty" was the source (see below EBBA), this play featured an "evil matron" and "ghoulish meal" (29, 26). In a note, she cites Andrew Clark as having connected the ballad to Dekker and Chettle's play without much enthusiasm (35n; Domestic Drama: A Survey of the origins, Antecedents and Nature of the Domestic Play in England, 1500-1540, 2 vols. [Salzburgh: Institut fur Englische Sprache und Literatur, 1975], 2:419).
For What It's Worth
In the ballad, "The Lady Isabella's Tragedy; or, The Step-Mother's Cruelty," the gruesome story is presented as though an historical fact. Following the title, the ballad has the following heading: "Being a Relation of a most lamentable and cruel Murder, committed on the Body of the Lady Isabella, the only Daughter of a Noble Duke, occasioned by the means of a Step-Mother and [acted by] the Master-Cook, who were both adjudged to suffer a cruel death for committing the said Horrid Act."
The story is as follows.
On one of many occasions when the duke was hunting, the envious step-mother tricked his daughter, Isabella, to go to the kitchen and tell the cook that he was to "dress to dinner straight that fair and milk-white Doe/ That in the Park doth shine so bright" (ll. 15-16). The cook, who shared the step-mother's malice, grabbed Isabella with "his cruel bloody hands," and said, "'Thou art the Doe that I must dress; see here, behold my knife!'" (l. 21). Attempting a rescue, the scullery boy pleaded for the lady's life, offering himself in her place: "'make your pies of me'" (l. 28). The cook threatened the boy with death if he should reveal the crime, then proceeded with his evil task. The lord came in from hunting, and missing his daughter at the table, he called for her to join him for dinner "to carve his meat" (l. 34). The step-mother put him off, saying the daughter (who habitually spent hours at church praying) had entered a nunnery and he should forget her. But the lord refused, vowing not to eat or drink until his daughter appeared. At this, the scullery boy burst out with the horrible truth: "If that you will your Daughter see, my Lord, cut up that Pye;/ Wherein her flesh is minced small and parched with the fire'" (ll. 40-41). Naming the step-mother and the cook as accomplices in the deed, the boy said that he had offered his "'own heart's blood'" (l. 44) but failed to save her. The lord, appropriately outraged, condemned the step-mother to be burned at the stake and the cook to be boiled in lead; he rewarded the scullery boy by making him "the Heir to all his Land" (l. 48).
A four-stanza epilogue, entitled "Their Lamentation," follows the ballad. It recounts the confessions of the cook and the step-mother as they confront their executions. The cook blames the step-mother for prompting him but says he deserves to die for his lack of remorse in the commission of the crime. The step-mother also accepts her punishment; she tells the throng gathered along the way as she passes from prison to the stake that she had broken laws and doomed her lord's daughter to death. The epilogue ends with the conventional sentiment that their deaths should be a warning to all.
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 14 November 2009.