Pierce of Exton
Thomas Dekker, Michael Drayton, Henry Chettle and Robert Wilson (1598)
Historical Records
Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)
F.45 (Greg I.85)
Lent vnto the company to geue mr willsone dickers } drayton & cheatell in pte of payment of a boocke } xxxxs called perce of extone the some of . . . . . . . . }
Theatrical Provenance
If it were performed, it would have been by the Admiral's at the Rose in the Spring of 1598. The partial payment of 2 pounds, and the absence of this title in the inventory list of playbooks subsequently drafted by Henslowe, casts some doubt over whether "Pierce of Exton" was completed. It may well have been, and the playwrights may have been paid the balance owed to them by the company rather than by Henslowe.
Probable Genre(s)
History (Harbage).
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
As Wiggins notes, the central protagonist's identity is relatively clear, but what aspect of his life the dramatists chose to depict is ambiguous:
The central incident was presumably the one for which the title character was known: his murder of King Richard II, seemingly at the instigation of King Henry IV. But this alone would not provide enough incident to be the basis of a play. The key, unknowable issue is whether the murder was the plot's climax, fulcrum, or initiating event: the play might have presented his crime as the eventual outcome of a scapegrace's life; it might have taken a cue from the Tudor chroniclers' emphasis on his remorse after the event, and presented his tormented wanderings abroad after his rejection and banishment by Henry IV, the beneficiary of the murder; or it might have done both. (1118)
References to the Play
Information welcome.
Critical Commentary
<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
For What It's Worth
Information welcome.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 18 March 2015.