Pastoral Tragedy, A: Difference between revisions

Line 71: Line 71:
== Critical Commentary  ==
== Critical Commentary  ==


[[WorksCited|Greg]] assumed the play was never finished; he notes that this instance is Chapman's last mention in Henslowe's diary (II, #177 p.204). He transcribed the receipt in Chapman's hand, including "x [ ]" as payment (I.xlix).
[[WorksCited|Greg]] assumed the play was never finished; he notes that this instance is Chapman's last mention in Henslowe's diary (II, #177 p.204). He transcribed the receipt in Chapman's hand, including "x [   ]" as payment (I.xlix).




[[WorksCited|Foakes]] does not see the "x" of the payment on the receipt in Chapman's hand. He refers readers to Greg's essay on the fragment, cited below (p. 266).
[[WorksCited|Foakes]] did not see the "x" of the payment on the receipt in Chapman's hand. He referred readers to Greg's essay on the fragment, cited below (p. 266).


<br>
<br>

Revision as of 15:14, 14 November 2020

George Chapman (1599)


Historical Records

Payments

To playwrights in Philip Henslowe's diary

Fol. 63v (Greg I.110)

Lent vnto Thomas downton the 17 of }
July 1599 [in ear] to lend vnto mr chapman }
in earneste of a pastrall tragedie the } xxxxs
some of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . }



To playwrights in a fragment from Philip Henslowe's diary, now British Museum MS. Add. 30262, f. 66

Greg, I, pp. xlviii-xlix; Foakes, p. 266:.

Receaued by me George Chapman for a Pastorall }
ending in a Tragedye in part payment the }
Sum[me] of fortye shilling[es], this xvijth of July } x [ ]
Anno 1599. }
By me George Chapman



Theatrical Provenance

The Admiral's Men, through their player-sharer Thomas Downton, paid George Chapman in earnest toward a pastoral tragedy in the summer of 1599, as the company played at the Rose and anticipated the arrival of the Chamberlain's Men across Main Lane at the Globe, which presumably was open for business by August.


Probable Genre(s)

Tragedy (Harbage)


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

None known.


References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

Greg assumed the play was never finished; he notes that this instance is Chapman's last mention in Henslowe's diary (II, #177 p.204). He transcribed the receipt in Chapman's hand, including "x [ ]" as payment (I.xlix).


Foakes did not see the "x" of the payment on the receipt in Chapman's hand. He referred readers to Greg's essay on the fragment, cited below (p. 266).



For What It's Worth

The receipt signed by Chapman is in Chapman's hand, as is his signature.


Works Cited

Greg, W. W. "A Fragment from Henslowe's Diary," The Library, 4th series, xix (1938-9), 180-4.



Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 5 November 2009.