Agamemnon: Difference between revisions
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Theatrical Provenance== | ==Theatrical Provenance== | ||
The Admiral's men acquired "Agamemnon" when they were playing at the Rose, but plans to build the Fortune were already underway. Depending on when the play was debuted as well as how long a run it enjoyed, it might have remained in the company's repertory into September 1600, by which time the move to the Fortune had been accomplished. | |||
==Probable Genre(s)== | ==Probable Genre(s)== |
Revision as of 13:44, 16 May 2019
Thomas Dekker, Henry Chettle (1599)
Historical Records
Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 63 (Greg, I.109)
- lent vnto mr dickers & mr chettell the 26 of
- maye 1599 in earneste of a Boocke called [troylles
- & creseda] ʌ the tragede of Agamemnon the some of ………… xxxs
- Lent vnto Robarte shawe the 30 of maye
- 1599 in fulle payment of ther Boocke called
- the tragedie of Agamemnone the some of….iijll vs
- to mr dickers & hary chettell
Payments, Miscellaneous (Henslowe's Diary)
- pd vnto the mr of Revelles man for lycensynge
- of a Boocke called the tragedie of agamemnon
- the 3 of June 1599 ………… vijs
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's men acquired "Agamemnon" when they were playing at the Rose, but plans to build the Fortune were already underway. Depending on when the play was debuted as well as how long a run it enjoyed, it might have remained in the company's repertory into September 1600, by which time the move to the Fortune had been accomplished.
Probable Genre(s)
<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
References to the Play
<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
Critical Commentary
<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Works Cited
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:
Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.