Wooing of Death, The: Difference between revisions
| (13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Historical Records == | == Historical Records == | ||
===Henslowe's | ===Payments=== | ||
====To playwrights in Philip Henslowe's diary==== | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Fol. 69 [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n180/mode/2up (Greg I.121)] | |||
<br> | |||
:Receaued by me Henry Chettle of m<sup>r </sup>Henshlowe | ::{| | ||
|- | |||
| Receaued by me Henry Chettle of m<sup>r </sup>Henshlowe ||} | |||
|- | |||
| in earnest of a booke Called the wooinge of deathe ||} xx<sup>s</sup> | |||
|- | |||
| By me henry chettle./ | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== Theatrical Provenance == | == Theatrical Provenance == | ||
The Admiral's players paid Henry Chettle 20s. for "The Wooing of Death" sometime between 27 April and 6 May 1600, which was during their final season at the Rose playhouse before a move to the Fortune in late summer or early fall. | The Admiral's players paid Henry Chettle 20s. for "The Wooing of Death" sometime between 27 April and 6 May 1600, which was during their final season at the Rose playhouse before a move to the Fortune in late summer or early fall. [[WorksCited|Greg II (#203, p. 213)]] suggested that a 5s loan to Chettle on May 6 1600 might have been toward the composition of this play. [[WorksCited|Chambers, ES (3.266) suggested that the play was "apparently not finished." Knutson finds no reason to consider it finished (p. 163). [[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'' (#1252)]] decides that it was "presumably performed" and agrees with Greg that the 5s loan on May 6 might have been for this play. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== Probable Genre(s) == | == Probable Genre(s) == | ||
Tragedy ? (Harbage) | Tragedy ? ([[WorksCited|Harbage]]) | ||
<br> | <br><br> | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
| Line 39: | Line 48: | ||
== Critical Commentary == | == Critical Commentary == | ||
<br> | |||
Greg | [[WorksCited|Collier]] noted that Chettle signature was autograph (p. 169, n.3). For [[WorksCited|Greg, II]], this play was one of many for which nothing was known (#203, p. 213). [[category:John Payne Collier]][[category:Autograph signature]] | ||
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue]] asks whether Death was wooed in the play or was the wooer (#1252). | |||
'''Gurr''' considers it one of the many plays in Henslowe's records that "never got beyond the early draft stage" (p. 105) | |||
<br><br> | |||
== For What It's Worth == | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | Information welcome. | ||
<br> <br> | |||
[[category:all]][[category:Partial payment]] [[category:Henslowe's records]] [[category:Admiral's]] [[category:Rose]] | [[category:all]][[category:Partial payment]] [[category:Henslowe's records]] [[category:Admiral's]] [[category:Rose]] | ||
== Works Cited == | == Works Cited == | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Gurr, Andrew. ‘’Shakespeare's Opposites: The Admiral's Company 1594-1625’’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.</div> | |||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Knutson, Roslyn L. “The Commercial Significance of the Payments for Playtexts in Henslowe’s Diary 1597-1603.” Medieval and Renaissance Drama in England 6 (1991): 117-63.</div> | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 31 October 2009. | Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 31 October 2009. | ||
[[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]] | [[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:Plays]][[category:Update]][[category:Henry Chettle]][[category:Chettle, Henry]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 4 August 2022
Historical Records
Payments
To playwrights in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 69 (Greg I.121)
Receaued by me Henry Chettle of mr Henshlowe } in earnest of a booke Called the wooinge of deathe } xxs By me henry chettle./
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's players paid Henry Chettle 20s. for "The Wooing of Death" sometime between 27 April and 6 May 1600, which was during their final season at the Rose playhouse before a move to the Fortune in late summer or early fall. Greg II (#203, p. 213) suggested that a 5s loan to Chettle on May 6 1600 might have been toward the composition of this play. [[WorksCited|Chambers, ES (3.266) suggested that the play was "apparently not finished." Knutson finds no reason to consider it finished (p. 163). Wiggins, Catalogue (#1252) decides that it was "presumably performed" and agrees with Greg that the 5s loan on May 6 might have been for this play.
Probable Genre(s)
Tragedy ? (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
Collier noted that Chettle signature was autograph (p. 169, n.3). For Greg, II, this play was one of many for which nothing was known (#203, p. 213).
Wiggins, Catalogue asks whether Death was wooed in the play or was the wooer (#1252).
Gurr considers it one of the many plays in Henslowe's records that "never got beyond the early draft stage" (p. 105)
For What It's Worth
Information welcome.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 31 October 2009.