Henry II: Difference between revisions
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues== | ==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues== | ||
Harbage proposes the ballad, "The Deathe of Faire Rosamond", which appeared in ''Strange Histories'' (1607), as a likely source for Davenport ("Palimpsest" 313). His suggestion depends on his argument that Mountfort's ''Henry the Second, King of England; With The Death of Rosamond'' (1693) is a palimpsest containing traces of the lost "Henry II" play. He finds linguistic parallels between the 1693 play and the ballad to support his case for ''Strange Histories'' as a source (313). | Harbage proposes the ballad, "The Deathe of Faire Rosamond", which appeared in Deloney's ''Strange Histories'' (1607), as a likely source for Davenport ("Palimpsest" 313). His suggestion depends on his argument that Mountfort's ''Henry the Second, King of England; With The Death of Rosamond'' (1693) is a palimpsest containing traces of the lost "Henry II" play. He finds linguistic parallels between the 1693 play and the ballad to support his case for ''Strange Histories'' as a source (313). | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 00:47, 30 January 2015
Davenport, Robert and Shakespeare, William (attrib.) (1624)
Historical Records
Stationers' Register
09 September 1653 (S.R.II, 1.429 CLIO)
- Master Mosely Entred also . . . the severall playes following . . xxs vjd
- ...
- Henry the first, & Hen: the 2d, by Shakespeare & Davenport.
Theatrical Provenance
King's?
Probable Genre(s)
History.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Harbage proposes the ballad, "The Deathe of Faire Rosamond", which appeared in Deloney's Strange Histories (1607), as a likely source for Davenport ("Palimpsest" 313). His suggestion depends on his argument that Mountfort's Henry the Second, King of England; With The Death of Rosamond (1693) is a palimpsest containing traces of the lost "Henry II" play. He finds linguistic parallels between the 1693 play and the ballad to support his case for Strange Histories as a source (313).
References to the Play
<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
Critical Commentary
In the context of Moseley's entries, Gary Taylor refers to "Henry I" and "Henry II" as if a single play: "The 1653 entry also attributes to Shakespeare The Merry Devil of Edmonton (as did Charles I), and to Shakespeare and Davenport the lost Henry the First and Henry the Second, which Davenport wrote or adapted in the 1620s..." (20, n43).
Harbage ("Palimpsest") points out that "[s]ince the long reign of King Stephen intervened between those of the two Henrys, Henry the First and Henry the Second seems an extremely unlikely title for a play; and as Moseley in 1653 was saving fees by entering two plays as one, it is fairly obvious that he was doing so in the present instance". Harbage is less sceptical than Bentley about the authenticity of Warburton's list of play manuscripts, deducing from Warburton's reference only to "Henry ye 1st" that "the Henry the Second manuscript had evidently become separated from its fellow" (310). He further argues that the play "may not be totally lost", and claims that Henry the Second, King of England; With The Death of Rosamond. A Tragedy. Acted at the Theatre Royal, By Their Majesties Servants (1693), a play usually associated with the actor William Mountfort (but not necessarily of his authorship) is "a stage version of 'Shakespeare and Davenport's' Henry the Second" (311).
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 30 January 2015.