Troilus and Cressida: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


:{| {{table}}
:{| {{table}}
| ||||||Lent vnto Thomas downton to lende
| |||||Lent vnto Thomas downton to lende
|-
|-
|ap<sup>r</sup>ell 7||||||vnto m<sup>r</sup> dickers & harey cheattell in
|ap<sup>r</sup>ell 7|||||vnto m<sup>r</sup> dickers & harey cheattell in
|-
|-
|daye 1599||||||earneste of ther boocke called Troyeles &
|daye 1599|||||earneste of ther boocke called Troyeles &
|-
| |||||creasse daye the some of . . . . . . . . . . . . iij<sup>li</sup>
|-
| |||||
|-
| |||||[...]
|-
| |||||
|-
|-
| ||||||creasse daye the some of . . . . . . . . . . . . iij<sup>li</sup>
|}
[...]
:{| {{table}}
|  |||||Lent vnto harey cheattell & m^r^ dickers in pte
|  |||||Lent vnto harey cheattell & m^r^ dickers in pte
|-
|-
Line 27: Line 29:
|  ||||cresseda the 16 of Ap^r^ell 1599 . . . . . . . . xx^s^
|  ||||cresseda the 16 of Ap^r^ell 1599 . . . . . . . . xx^s^
|}
|}




Revision as of 11:25, 21 July 2012

Henry Chettle and Thomas Dekker (1599)


Historical Records

Henslowe's Diary

F. 54v (Greg I.104)

Lent vnto Thomas downton to lende
aprell 7 vnto mr dickers & harey cheattell in
daye 1599 earneste of ther boocke called Troyeles &
creasse daye the some of . . . . . . . . . . . . iijli
[...]
Lent vnto harey cheattell & m^r^ dickers in pte
of payment of ther boocke called Troyelles &
cresseda the 16 of Ap^r^ell 1599 . . . . . . . . xx^s^



Theatrical Provenance

<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>


Probable Genre(s)

<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>


References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>


For What It's Worth

<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>


Works Cited

<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>


Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.