Randall, Earl of Chester (Chester’s Tragedy): Difference between revisions

(cleanup)
Line 26: Line 26:
==Theatrical Provenance==
==Theatrical Provenance==


During the process of writing the play seems to have changed hands from Worcester's Men to the Admiral's (328).
Henslowe's references to the play suggest that during the process of writing it changed hands from Worcester's Men to the Admiral's (Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador 328).




Line 36: Line 36:
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


There are three Earls of Chester called Ranulf in Holinshed's ''Chronicles'', and two of them are colourful enough to warrant plays about them: Ranulf de Gernons (d. 1153) and Ranulf de Blundevill (d.1232)(330)  
Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador note that Holinshed's ''Chronicles'' mentions three Earls of Chester called Ranulf, and that two of them had lives colourful enough to stimulate the interest of a dramatist: Ranulf de Gernons (d. 1153) and Ranulf de Blundevill (d.1232) (330).


Other writers had already represented these men. Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador point to a line in ''Piers Plowman'' (V.395) which mentions the existence of folk "rymes about Robyn hood and Randolf Earl of Chestre". They further note that Anthony Munday included a "Ranulphe, Earl of Chester" in ''John a Kent and John a Cumber'', and an Earl of Chester in both ''The Downfall'' and ''The Death of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon'' (the latter Earl is de Blundevill). Another appears briefly in the Admiral's Men's play ''Look About You''. The popular lost play ''[[The Wise Man of West Chester]]'' may also have been an influence (329-30).


Anthony Munday included a "Ranulphe, Earl of Chester" in ''John a Kent and John a Cumber'', and an Earl of Chester in both ''The Downfall'' and ''The Death of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon'' (the latter is de Blundevill; 330). He also appears briefly in the Admiral's Men's play ''Look About You''. (329)
Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador suspect that Middleton's play was about de Gernons. While de Blundevill's life has dramatic potential, involving opposition to England paying tithes to Rome, and a rescue from a besieged castle, it does not seem suited to tragedy. They argue that de Gernons, a baron who pursued his personal autonomy over the rule of King Stephen, took him captive, but was then captured himself and forced to surrender, is closer to the pattern of tragedy (330).
 
''Piers Plowman'' (V.395) implies the presence of folk "rymes about Robyn hood and Randolf Earl of Chestre". (329)
 
The popular lost play ''[[The Wise Man of West Chester]]'' may also have been an influence (329).
 
 
De Blundevill's life involved opposition to England paying tithes to Rome and his rescue from a besieged castle, but that there is no obvious tragic potential. It's more likely that the play was about de Gernons, who pursued his personal autonomy over the rule of King Stephen, taking him captive, before being captured himself (330).




==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
None known.




Line 57: Line 51:
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
None known.
 
 


==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador imagine that the play might have depicted Ranulf de Gernon's opposition to the King, his capturing of him, and his subsequent surrender after being captured himself. They suggest that although Holinshed continues with a number of other "alliances intrigues and battles" involving Ranulf, Middleton could have created a teagic structure by having Ranulf be summarily killed at the end, perhaps "poisoned by William Peverell, whom, it is said, he had robbed of his land". They further speculate that Empress Matilda could have provided an "element of sexual violence or violent sexuality" (330).
Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador imagine that Middleton's play might have depicted Ranulf de Gernon's opposition to the King, his capturing of him, and his subsequent surrender after being captured himself. They suggest that although Holinshed describes further events in de Gernon's life - other "alliances, intrigues and battles" - Middleton could have created a teagic structure by having Ranulf be summarily killed after his surrender, perhaps "poisoned by William Peverell, whom, it is said, he had robbed of his land". They further speculate that an appearance by Empress Matilda could have provided the "element of sexual violence or violent sexuality" that Middleton often favoured (330).




Line 70: Line 62:
*Doris Feldmann and Kurt Tetzeli von Rosador, "Lost Plays: A Brief Account", in ''Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works'', ed. Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007), 328-333.
*Doris Feldmann and Kurt Tetzeli von Rosador, "Lost Plays: A Brief Account", in ''Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works'', ed. Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007), 328-333.


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>
[[category:tragedy]][[category:barons]][[category:medieval]][[category:Admiral's]]




Site created and maintained by [[your name]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
Site created and maintained by [[David Nicol]], Dalhousie University; updated 4 August 2010.
[[category:all]]
[[category:all]]

Revision as of 18:49, 4 August 2010

Thomas Middleton (1602)


Historical Records

The play appears in Henslowe's diary as follows:

Lent at the a poyntment of John ducke
in earnest of A playe called [title left blank]
the some of xxs 3 of octobʒ 1602
to mr mydellton (Foakes, 217)

Although this entry is for an untitled play, Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador believe it to refer to Randall given "[t]he progressive concretization of the title, the proximity of dates, [and] the complementary nature of the statements about the payments" (328).

pd at the apoynt of wm Jube the 21
of octobʒ 1602 vnto mr medelton in pte of
payment ffor his playe called [felmelanco] Chester
tragedie the some of iiijli (Foakes, 205)

Foakes notes that the play title seems to be in Thomas Downton's hand, although Greg thought it was Robert Shaa's.

Lent unto Edward Jube the 9 of novmbʒ 1602
to paye vnto mr mydelton in fulle paymente
of his playe called Randowlle earlle of chester
the some of xxxx s (Foakes, 206)

Theatrical Provenance

Henslowe's references to the play suggest that during the process of writing it changed hands from Worcester's Men to the Admiral's (Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador 328).


Probable Genre(s)

Tragedy.


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador note that Holinshed's Chronicles mentions three Earls of Chester called Ranulf, and that two of them had lives colourful enough to stimulate the interest of a dramatist: Ranulf de Gernons (d. 1153) and Ranulf de Blundevill (d.1232) (330).

Other writers had already represented these men. Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador point to a line in Piers Plowman (V.395) which mentions the existence of folk "rymes about Robyn hood and Randolf Earl of Chestre". They further note that Anthony Munday included a "Ranulphe, Earl of Chester" in John a Kent and John a Cumber, and an Earl of Chester in both The Downfall and The Death of Robert, Earl of Huntingdon (the latter Earl is de Blundevill). Another appears briefly in the Admiral's Men's play Look About You. The popular lost play The Wise Man of West Chester may also have been an influence (329-30).

Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador suspect that Middleton's play was about de Gernons. While de Blundevill's life has dramatic potential, involving opposition to England paying tithes to Rome, and a rescue from a besieged castle, it does not seem suited to tragedy. They argue that de Gernons, a baron who pursued his personal autonomy over the rule of King Stephen, took him captive, but was then captured himself and forced to surrender, is closer to the pattern of tragedy (330).


References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

None known.

For What It's Worth

Feldmann and Tetzeli von Rosador imagine that Middleton's play might have depicted Ranulf de Gernon's opposition to the King, his capturing of him, and his subsequent surrender after being captured himself. They suggest that although Holinshed describes further events in de Gernon's life - other "alliances, intrigues and battles" - Middleton could have created a teagic structure by having Ranulf be summarily killed after his surrender, perhaps "poisoned by William Peverell, whom, it is said, he had robbed of his land". They further speculate that an appearance by Empress Matilda could have provided the "element of sexual violence or violent sexuality" that Middleton often favoured (330).


Works Cited

  • Doris Feldmann and Kurt Tetzeli von Rosador, "Lost Plays: A Brief Account", in Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works, ed. Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007), 328-333.


Site created and maintained by David Nicol, Dalhousie University; updated 4 August 2010.