Crack Me This Nut: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
==Historical Records==
==Historical Records==


===Henslowe's ''Diary'': Performances===
{| {{table}}
{| {{table}}
| [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/1up F.12<sup>v</sup> / Greg 1.24]:||||||||
| [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/1up F.12<sup>v</sup> / Greg 1.24]:||||||||
Line 9: Line 10:
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|-
|-
| y<sup>e</sup> 1 of septmb[er] 1595||||ne . . ||R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . .||iij<sup>ll</sup> j<sup>s</sup>
| y<sup>e</sup> 5 of septmb[er] 1595||||ne . . ||R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . .||iij<sup>ll</sup> j<sup>s</sup>
|-
|-
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Line 32: Line 33:
|-
|-
| y<sup>e</sup> 8 of octob[er] 1595||||||R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . ||xxvj<sup>s</sup>
| y<sup>e</sup> 8 of octob[er] 1595||||||R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . ||xxvj<sup>s</sup>
|-
| ||||||||
|-
| y<sup>e</sup> 20 of octob[er] 1595||||||R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . ||xxj<sup>s</sup>
|-
|-
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Line 101: Line 106:




===Henslowe's ''Diary'': Purchases===
[http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n211/mode/1up Fol.95 / Greg 1.151]:
[http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n211/mode/1up Fol.95 / Greg 1.151]:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Line 120: Line 126:
==Theatrical Provenance==
==Theatrical Provenance==


<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>
Performed as a new play by the Admiral's men 5 September 1595, for a total of 16 performances. It premiered in a period when the Admiral's "began to introduce new plays very quickly: 'Longshanks' on August 29, 'Crack Me This Nut' a week later, and '[[New World's Tragedy, The|The New World's Tragedy]]' two weeks after that" (Knutson 122). Henslowe's acquisition (on behalf of the Admiral's) of the book of "the nvtte" from Alleyn in 1601 suggests an intention to revive the play, though no subsequent performance dates are known.




Line 132: Line 138:
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
It is frustrating that virtually nothing can be ascertained with any certainty about the subject of this considerably successful play. For a new speculation on subject matter, see [[#For What It's Worth|'''For What It's Worth''']] below.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
As Greg observes, "[t]he phrase was proverbial" [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary02hensuoft#page/176/mode/1up (2.176)]. It was the subtitle of an anti-Martinist tract (''Pap with a Hatchet, alias A Fig for my Godson, or Crack Me This Nut'', 1589), and as Greg notes, "[i]t is no doubt the tract and not the play that is alluded to in ''Old Fortunatus''" [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary02hensuoft#page/176/mode/1up (2.176)]. There seems, therefore, no reason to believe Dekker was referring to this lost play.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


[http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary02hensuoft#page/176/mode/1up Greg 2.1176] notes that "[t]he phrase was proverbial. It was the sub-title of ''Pap with a Hatchet'', one of the anti-Martinist tracts. It is no doubt the tract and not the play that is alluded to in ''Old Fortunatus''".
Hazlitt suggests without evidence that "It is probably identical with the " Play of the Nut," mentioned by Henslowe under December, 1601" (53).
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
Gurr notes only 14 performances of this play, not the 16 listed [[#Historical Records|'''above''']] in the extracts from Henslowe's ''Diary'': "New plays ''Chinon'', ''Longshanks'', and ''Crack Me This Nut'', all had 14 stagings" (Gurr 99).
<br>
<br>
<br>
==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


A hitherto unconsidered possibility is that ''Crack Me This Nut'' may not have been a comedy at all, but a King Lear style tragedy. An entry in the Stationers' Register for 20 January 1595/96 reads:
A hitherto unconsidered possibility is that ''Crack Me This Nut'' may not have been a comedy at all, but a ''King Lear''-style tragedy. An entry in the Stationers' Register for 20 January 1595/96 reads:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding="5" border="0" class="wikitable"
{| cellpadding="5" border="0" class="wikitable"
Line 156: Line 165:
| '''Master Ponsonby.'''  
| '''Master Ponsonby.'''  
| Entred for his copie vnder the hands of the Wardens A booke<br>Intitled ''The Paragon of pleasaunt histories'' . . . vjd<br> ''Or this Nutt was neuer Cracked Contayninge a Discourse of a<br>nobl[e] kinge and his Three sonnes /''
| Entred for his copie vnder the hands of the Wardens A booke<br>Intitled ''The Paragon of pleasaunt histories'' . . . vjd<br> ''Or this Nutt was neuer Cracked Contayninge a Discourse of a<br>nobl[e] kinge and his Three sonnes /''
<br>(S.R.1, 3.57 / Fol.7)
|}
|}
(S.R.1, 3.57 / Fol.7)
 
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Unfortunately, like the play, this text appears to be lost.
Unfortunately, like the play, this text appears to be lost.
Line 164: Line 174:
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==


<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Greg 1</div>
 
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Greg 2</div>
 
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Gurr, Andrew. ''The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642''. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.</div>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Hazlitt, W. Carew. ''A Manual for the collector and amateur of old English plays''. 1892. London: Burt Franklin, 1966 reprint.</div>
 
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Knutson, Roslyn L. “What was James Burbage ''Thinking''???” ''Thunder at a Playhouse: Essays on Shakespeare and the Early Modern Stage'', eds. Peter Kanelos and Matt Kozusko. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2010. 116-30.</div>
 
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">S.R.</div>
Site created and maintained by [[your name]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.
<br>
[[category:all]]
<br>
<br>
Site created and maintained by [[David McInnis]], University of Melbourne; updated 12 March 2011.
[[category:all]][[category:Admiral's]][[Category:Fathers and sons]][[category:S.R.]][[category:Rose]][[category:inheritance]][[category:jests]][[category:mythical kings]][[category:Noble...]][[category:proverbs]]

Revision as of 03:26, 12 March 2011

Anon. (1595)


Historical Records

Henslowe's Diary: Performances

F.12v / Greg 1.24:
ye 5 of septmb[er] 1595 ne . . R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . iijll js
ye 12 of septmb[er] 1595 . . . . . . . . R[d] at cracke me this nutte . . . . . . . . . . iijll
. . . . . . .
F.13 / Greg 1.25:
ye 24 of septmb[er] 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xxxxijs
ye 2[7]8 of septmb[er] 1595 ________ ________ R[d] at crack me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . iijllvjs
ye 8 of octob[er] 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . xxvjs
ye 20 of octob[er] 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xxjs
ye 24 of octob[er] 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xxiijs
ye 5 of novmb[et] 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . xxiiijs
. . . . . . .
F.14 / Greg 1.27:
ye 18 of novmb[er] 1595 ________ ________ R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . . xxiiijs
ye 6 of desemb[er] 1595 [_______ ________] R[d] at Crack me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . xvs
ye 2 of Jenewary 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . ixs
ye 14 of Jenewary 1595 R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xxiijs
. . . . . . .
F.14v / Greg 1.28:
ye 7 of febreary 1595 R[d] at crack me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . xixs
. . . . . . .
F.15v / Greg 1.30:
ye 7 of maye 1596 R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xviijs
. . . . . . .
F.21v / Greg 1.42:
ye 7 of June 1596 ___mr pd___ ________ R[d] at cracke me this nvtte . . . . . . . . . . xxviijs
ye 23 of June 1596 R[d] at cracke me this nvtt . . . . . . . . . . xijs


Henslowe's Diary: Purchases

Fol.95 / Greg 1.151:

Lay owt for the company to bye buckerom . . . . . .}
for a sewt for the playe of the nvtte to the. . . . . .}vs
littell tayller the 4 of desemb[er] 1601 the some of }

F.96 / Greg 1.155:

pd at the apoyntment of the copmanye the. . . . . . .}
18 of Janewary 1601 vnto E Alleyn for iij boockes. . . }
wch were played called the french docter the. . . . . } vjll
massaker of france & the nvtte the some of . . . . .. }


Theatrical Provenance

Performed as a new play by the Admiral's men 5 September 1595, for a total of 16 performances. It premiered in a period when the Admiral's "began to introduce new plays very quickly: 'Longshanks' on August 29, 'Crack Me This Nut' a week later, and 'The New World's Tragedy' two weeks after that" (Knutson 122). Henslowe's acquisition (on behalf of the Admiral's) of the book of "the nvtte" from Alleyn in 1601 suggests an intention to revive the play, though no subsequent performance dates are known.


Probable Genre(s)

Comedy (?) (Harbage); tragedy? (see For What It's Worth below)


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

It is frustrating that virtually nothing can be ascertained with any certainty about the subject of this considerably successful play. For a new speculation on subject matter, see For What It's Worth below.


References to the Play

As Greg observes, "[t]he phrase was proverbial" (2.176). It was the subtitle of an anti-Martinist tract (Pap with a Hatchet, alias A Fig for my Godson, or Crack Me This Nut, 1589), and as Greg notes, "[i]t is no doubt the tract and not the play that is alluded to in Old Fortunatus" (2.176). There seems, therefore, no reason to believe Dekker was referring to this lost play.


Critical Commentary

Hazlitt suggests without evidence that "It is probably identical with the " Play of the Nut," mentioned by Henslowe under December, 1601" (53).

Gurr notes only 14 performances of this play, not the 16 listed above in the extracts from Henslowe's Diary: "New plays Chinon, Longshanks, and Crack Me This Nut, all had 14 stagings" (Gurr 99).


For What It's Worth

A hitherto unconsidered possibility is that Crack Me This Nut may not have been a comedy at all, but a King Lear-style tragedy. An entry in the Stationers' Register for 20 January 1595/96 reads:

Master Ponsonby. Entred for his copie vnder the hands of the Wardens A booke
Intitled The Paragon of pleasaunt histories . . . vjd
Or this Nutt was neuer Cracked Contayninge a Discourse of a
nobl[e] kinge and his Three sonnes /


(S.R.1, 3.57 / Fol.7)

Unfortunately, like the play, this text appears to be lost.


Works Cited

Greg 1
Greg 2
Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespeare Company, 1594-1642. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.
Hazlitt, W. Carew. A Manual for the collector and amateur of old English plays. 1892. London: Burt Franklin, 1966 reprint.
Knutson, Roslyn L. “What was James Burbage Thinking???” Thunder at a Playhouse: Essays on Shakespeare and the Early Modern Stage, eds. Peter Kanelos and Matt Kozusko. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2010. 116-30.
S.R.




Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; updated 12 March 2011.