Conquest of Brute, Parts 1 and 2
John Day, Henry Chettle (1598)
Historical Records
Payments to Playwrights (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 49 (Greg I.93)
- Lent the company the 30 of July 1598 to
- bye a Boocke of John daye called the con
- queste of brute wth the first fyndinge of the
- bathe the some of….. xxxxs
F. 50 (Greg I.95)
- Lent vnto hary cheattell the 8 of [aguste] 1598
- in earneste of a Boocke called Brute
- the some of………………………………. ixs
- Lent vnto hary cheattell the 9 of [aguste] septmbȝ 1598 in
- earneste of a Bocke called Brute at the
- a poyntment of Johne synger the some of…..... xxs
- Lent vnto hary cheattell the 16 of septmbȝ 1598
- in earneste of a Boocke called Brute………vs
F. 51 (Greg I.97)
- Lent vnto the companey the 12 of octobȝ 1598
- to geve harey cheattell in parte of payment for
- <for> his playe called Brutte some of…. xs
- Layde owt for the company the 18 of octobȝ
- 1598 for a boocke called Brutte the
- some of to harey chettell……. iijll
- Lent vnto the company the 22 of octobȝ 1598 to
- paye harey cheattell for his boocke called Brute
- in fulle payment the some of………… ls
Payments for Properties (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 52v (Greg 1.100)
- dd vnto same Rowley the 12 desembȝ 1598
- to bye diuers thinges for to macke cottes
- for gyants in brvtte the some of… xxiiijs
Payments, Miscellaneous (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 54 (Greg 1.103)
- pd vnto the mr of the Revelles man for the lycensynge
- of a boocke called brute grenshallde the some of.. vijs
Theatrical Provenance
<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>
Probable Genre(s)
<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>
References to the Play
<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
Critical Commentary
<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Works Cited
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>
Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month Y