Fair Maid of Italy, The: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==='''''Henslowe's Diary'''''=== | ==='''''Henslowe's Diary'''''=== | ||
<br> | |||
'''F. 8<sup>v</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n76/mode/2up Greg, I.16])''' | '''F. 8<sup>v</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n76/mode/2up Greg, I.16])''' | ||
Line 39: | Line 40: | ||
==Theatrical Provenance== | ==Theatrical Provenance== | ||
''The Fair Maid of Italy'' first appears in the diary in the offerings of Sussex's players at the Rose. It does not carry Henslowe's enigmatic "ne"; apparently, then, it was a play that had been in production for some time. Sussex's players gave performances at the Rose for about seven weeks, 27 Dec 1593 through 6 Feb 1594, during which time they offered ''The Fair Maid of Italy'' twice for an average return to Henslowe of 15s. 6d. Two months later, the play appeared among the offerings "to geather" of Sussex's men with the [[:category:Queen's (Elizabeth)|Queen's players]]. It does not appear elsewhere in theatrical documents. | |||
==Probable Genre(s)== | ==Probable Genre(s)== | ||
Comedy (Harbage) | |||
==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues== | ==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues== | ||
None known. | |||
<br><br> | |||
==References to the Play== | ==References to the Play== | ||
None known. | |||
< | <br><br> | ||
==Critical Commentary== | ==Critical Commentary== | ||
:'''McMillin''' asked a crucial question with implications for the performance history of ''The Fair Maid of Italy''. He asked, "Why should Sussex's men—and the Queen's men, for that matter—have established connections with Henslowe in 1593-94?" (215). His answer was in the form of "what if": "Suppose that Sussex's men appeared at Henslowe's playhouse . because at that time, like the other companies in the ''Diary'' for the 1590s, they were associated with [[category:Edward Alleyn]] Edward Alleyn" (218). One inference that could follow from McMillin's supposition is that Sussex's players—by mid-December 1593—were an amalgam of players from companies undergoing transition, one of which companies was [[:category:Strange's|Strange's men]] with whom Alleyn had recently been associated. Some number of Strange's players transitioned to the Chamberlain's players in June 1594 (i.e., [[category:Thomas Pope]]Thomas Pope, [[category:John Heminges]]John Heminges, [[category:William Kempe]]William Kempe, and [[category:Augustine Phillips]] Augustine Phillips). | |||
<br> | |||
:'''Knutson''' | |||
Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
==For What It's Worth== | ==For What It's Worth== | ||
Although no narrative or dramatic analogues are known, some guesses may be warranted. The designations "fair" and "maid" were widespread in Elizabethan repertory offerings. The most notable extant play is ''Fair Em,'' and it is reasonable to extrapolate from that example that the fair maid of Sussex's play was a commoner, doubtless pursued by various unsuitable suitors but perhaps one desirable one. The nationality of Italy in the title suggests generic connections with lost plays such as ''[[Love of a Grecian Lady, The|The Love of a Grecian Lady]]'', ''[[Grecian Comedy]]'', and ''[[Love of an English Lady, The|The Love of an English Lady]]''. Of course, it is always possible—with that "foreign" connection—that the Italian fair maid had a more exotic sexuality, as apparently "Hiren the Fair Greek" did in ''[[Turkish Mahomet and Hiren the Fair Greek, The|The Turkish Mahomet and Hiren the Fair Greek]]''. | |||
<br><br> | |||
==Works Cited== | ==Works Cited== | ||
< | Knutson, Roslyn L. "What's So Special about 1594." ''Shakespeare Quarterly'' 61.4 (2010): 449-67.<br> | ||
McMillin, Scott. ''Sussex's Men in 1594: The Evidence of ''Titus Andronicus'' and ''The Jew of Malta." ''Theatre Survey'' 32 (1991): 214-23. | |||
Site created and maintained by [[ | Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 9 February 2012. | ||
[[category:all]][[category:Sussex's]] | [[category:all]][[category:Sussex's]] |
Revision as of 13:37, 9 February 2012
Historical Records
Henslowe's Diary
F. 8v (Greg, I.16)
In a listing headed as follows:
- "In the name of god Amen begninge the 27 of
- desember 1593 the earle of susex his men
R[d] at the fayer mayd of ytale the 12 Jenewary 1593 ………. ixs R[d] at the fayer mayd of ytaly the 21 of Jenewary 1593 ………. xxijs
F. 9 (Greg, I.17)
In a listing headed as follows:
- Jn the name of God Amen beginning at easter 1593
- the Quenes men & my lord of Susexe to geather
R[d] at the fayer mayd of Jtaley ye 4 of aprell 1594 21 of Jenewary 1593 ………. xxiijs
Theatrical Provenance
The Fair Maid of Italy first appears in the diary in the offerings of Sussex's players at the Rose. It does not carry Henslowe's enigmatic "ne"; apparently, then, it was a play that had been in production for some time. Sussex's players gave performances at the Rose for about seven weeks, 27 Dec 1593 through 6 Feb 1594, during which time they offered The Fair Maid of Italy twice for an average return to Henslowe of 15s. 6d. Two months later, the play appeared among the offerings "to geather" of Sussex's men with the Queen's players. It does not appear elsewhere in theatrical documents.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
- McMillin asked a crucial question with implications for the performance history of The Fair Maid of Italy. He asked, "Why should Sussex's men—and the Queen's men, for that matter—have established connections with Henslowe in 1593-94?" (215). His answer was in the form of "what if": "Suppose that Sussex's men appeared at Henslowe's playhouse . because at that time, like the other companies in the Diary for the 1590s, they were associated with Edward Alleyn" (218). One inference that could follow from McMillin's supposition is that Sussex's players—by mid-December 1593—were an amalgam of players from companies undergoing transition, one of which companies was Strange's men with whom Alleyn had recently been associated. Some number of Strange's players transitioned to the Chamberlain's players in June 1594 (i.e.,Thomas Pope,John Heminges,William Kempe, and Augustine Phillips).
- Knutson
For What It's Worth
Although no narrative or dramatic analogues are known, some guesses may be warranted. The designations "fair" and "maid" were widespread in Elizabethan repertory offerings. The most notable extant play is Fair Em, and it is reasonable to extrapolate from that example that the fair maid of Sussex's play was a commoner, doubtless pursued by various unsuitable suitors but perhaps one desirable one. The nationality of Italy in the title suggests generic connections with lost plays such as The Love of a Grecian Lady, Grecian Comedy, and The Love of an English Lady. Of course, it is always possible—with that "foreign" connection—that the Italian fair maid had a more exotic sexuality, as apparently "Hiren the Fair Greek" did in The Turkish Mahomet and Hiren the Fair Greek.
Works Cited
Knutson, Roslyn L. "What's So Special about 1594." Shakespeare Quarterly 61.4 (2010): 449-67.
McMillin, Scott. Sussex's Men in 1594: The Evidence of Titus Andronicus and The Jew of Malta." Theatre Survey 32 (1991): 214-23.
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 9 February 2012.