Fair Maid of Italy, The
Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 8v (Greg, I.16)
In a listing headed as follows:
- "In the name of god Amen begninge the 27 of
- desember 1593 the earle of susex his men
Res at the fayer mayd of ytale the 12 Jenewary 1593 ………. ixs Res at the fayer mayd of ytaly the 21 of Jenewary 1593 ………. xxijs
F. 9 (Greg, I.17)
In a listing headed as follows:
- Jn the name of God Amen beginning at easter 1593
- the Quenes men & my lord of Susexe to geather
Res at the fayer mayd of Jtaley ye 4 of aprell 1594 21 of Jenewary 1593 ………. xxiijs
"The Fair Maid of Italy" first appears in the diary in the offerings of Sussex's players at the Rose. It does not carry Henslowe's enigmatic "ne"; apparently, then, it was a play that had been in production for some time. Sussex's players gave performances at the Rose for about seven weeks, 27 Dec 1593 through 6 Feb 1594, during which time they offered "The Fair Maid of Italy" twice for an average return to Henslowe of 15s. 6d. Two months later, the play appeared among the offerings "to geather" of Sussex's men with the Queen's players. It does not appear elsewhere in theatrical documents.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
References to the Play
- McMillin asked a crucial question with implications for the performance history of "The Fair Maid of Italy." He asked, "Why should Sussex's men—and the Queen's men, for that matter—have established connections with Henslowe in 1593-94?" (215). His answer was in the form of "what if": "Suppose that Sussex's men appeared at Henslowe's playhouse . because at that time, like the other companies in the Diary for the 1590s, they were associated with Edward Alleyn" (218). One inference that could follow from McMillin's supposition is that Sussex's players—by mid-December 1593—were an amalgam of players from companies undergoing transition, one of which companies was Strange's men with whom Alleyn had recently been associated. Some number of Strange's players transitioned to the Chamberlain's players in June 1594 (i.e., Thomas Pope, John Heminges, William Kempe, and Augustine Phillips).
- Knutson argues that Sussex's men were not as marginal a company in December 1593 as they are often considered (462). In the course of that argument, she observes that its offerings during the run at the Rose brought in respectable receipts to Henslowe, even though most of the plays—now being lost—have had no impact on discussions of the theatrical marketplace. Speaking of "Fair Maid" specifically, she notes that for the Rose weeks of performance, "Fair Maid" is the only play in Sussex's repertory that "averages under 20 shillings, yet it is the one play from the January run that is picked up when Sussex's Men play with the Queen's Men in Easter Week" (465).
See also Wiggins serial number 926.
For What It's Worth
Although no narrative or dramatic analogues are known, some guesses may be warranted. The designations "fair" and "maid" were widespread in early modern English repertory offerings. The most notable relatively contemporary extant play is Fair Em, and it is reasonable to extrapolate from that example that the fair maid of Sussex's play was a commoner, doubtless pursued by various unsuitable suitors but perhaps one desirable one. On the other hand, the nationality of Italy in the title suggests generic connections with lost plays such as "The Love of a Grecian Lady," "Grecian Comedy," and "The Love of an English Lady." Incidentally, the latter set was roughly contemporary with "The Fair Maid of Italy" also; they belong to the repertory of the Admiral's men in 1594-5. Of course, it is always possible—with that "foreign" connection—that the Italian fair maid had an exotic sexuality, as apparently "Hiren the Fair Greek" did in "The Turkish Mahomet and Hiren the Fair Greek."
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 9 February 2012.