Woman's Masterpiece, The: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==Critical Commentary== | ==Critical Commentary== | ||
"The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447). | "The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447). Harbage, ("Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest", 309), guesses (rather randomly) that the play could have been by Brome, as the title sounds not unlike his. | ||
==For What It's Worth== | ==For What It's Worth== | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 14 April 2010
Historical Records
Entered on Marriott's List (1653):
- The Womans Master Peice
Theatrical Provenance
Unknown
Probable Genre(s)
Unknown
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known
References to the Play
None known
Critical Commentary
"The only evidence for the existence of a play of this name is Marriott's entry of the play in the Stationers' Register" (Bentley, 5.1447). Harbage, ("Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest", 309), guesses (rather randomly) that the play could have been by Brome, as the title sounds not unlike his.
For What It's Worth
For discussion of Marriott's list, follow this link: Marriott's List (1653)
Site created and maintained by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University; updated 11 January 2010.