Disguises: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:{| {{table}} | :{| {{table}} | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 2 of octob | | y<sup>e</sup> 2 of octob''er'' 1595||………. ne||||R[d] at the desgysses||……….||xxxxiij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 10 of octob | | y<sup>e</sup> 10 of octob''er'' 1595||……….||||R[d] at the desgyses||……….||xxix<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 16 of octob | | y<sup>e</sup> 16 of octob''er'' 1595||……….||||R[d] at the desgysses||……….||x<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 27 of octob | | y<sup>e</sup> 27 of octob''er'' 1595||……….||||R[d] at the desgyses||……….||xix<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 30 of octob | | y<sup>e</sup> 30 of octob''er'' 1595||……….||||R[d] at the desgysses||……….||xxix<sup>s</sup> | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
:{| {{table}} | :{| {{table}} | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 10 of novmb | | y<sup>e</sup> 10 of novmb''er''||……….||||R[d] at desgysses||……….||xv<sup>s</sup> | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> |
Revision as of 16:54, 9 February 2012
Historical Records
Henslowe's Diary
F. 13 (Greg I.25)
ye 2 of october 1595 ………. ne R[d] at the desgysses ………. xxxxiijs ye 10 of october 1595 ………. R[d] at the desgyses ………. xxixs ye 16 of october 1595 ………. R[d] at the desgysses ………. xs ye 27 of october 1595 ………. R[d] at the desgyses ………. xixs ye 30 of october 1595 ………. R[d] at the desgysses ………. xxixs
F. 14 (Greg, I.27)
ye 10 of novmber ………. R[d] at desgysses ………. xvs
Theatrical Provenance
In the fall season of 1595, Disguises was the fourth play with Henslowe's enigmatic "ne" offered at the Rose by the Admiral's players. Its receipts averaged 24s. per performance.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy ? (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
As is the case with many lost plays, scholars have suggested that Disguises is Henslowe's title for some other lost or extant play.
- Collier considered it a new play, but entertained the possibility that it might have had connections with "the species of dramatic entertainment" called "'a disguising'"; he also suggested that it might have anticipated plays such as George Chapman's Blind Beggar of Alexandria, in which "one actor assumed several characters" (Diary, p. 59).
- Fleay thought the play "the original version" of Chapman's extant May Day (BCED, 2.304), but at his entry for May Day he did not explain his reasoning (BCED, 1.51).
- Greg repeated Fleay's suggestion of May Day, but expressed no enthusiasm for the link because the extant text of Chapman's play shows "no trace of revision" (II. Item 78, p. 177).
- Adams?
- Harbage, apparently following Adams, links Disguises with the lost Disguises or love in disguise, a pettycoat voyage attributed to Thomas Dekker on Abraham Hill's list of early plays in manuscript.
- Gurr argues that Disguises is Henslowe's title for the extant Look About You. He constructs an argument about the personality, or house style, of the Admiral's players in part on the identification of Disguises with Look About You, which was printed in 1600 with a title-page advertisement of the Admiral's company (no S. R.). That house style, according to Gurr, was plays with multiple disguises meant to exploit both the "same body of customers" and the "familiar faces" of their players (1). He sees that style begin to develop in December 1594 with The Wise Man of West Chester (to him, a.k.a. John a Kent and John a Cumber [211-12]), continued in October 1595 with Disguises (to him, a.k.a. Look About You), and leading toward George Chapman's Blind Beggar of Alexandria in February 1596 (24-25). See pp. 51-77 for Gurr's detailed discussion of Disguises as Look About You.
For What It's Worth
One oddity about the 1600 publication of Look About You is that it advertises itself as "lately played by the right honourable the Lord High Admiral his seruaunts", whereas the other plays from that company published in that year also advertise the patron's new (and newly created) title, Earl of Nottingham.
Works Cited
Adams, Joseph Q. "Hill's List of Early Plays in Manuscript." The Library n.s. XX (1939): 71-99.
Collier, John Payne, ed. The Diary of Philip Henslowe, from 1591 to 1609. London: Shakespeare Society, 1845.
Gurr, Andrew. Shakespeare's Opposites: The Admiral's Company 1594-1625. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009.
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita; updated 7 February 2012.