Witch of Islington, The: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Theatrical Provenance == | == Theatrical Provenance == | ||
The Admiral's | The play first appears in theatrical records in repertorial listings for the Admiral's men in July 1597. Because the play was not marked with Henslowe's "ne," characteristic of new plays, scholars have assigned it a dating range of 1590-1597 but not offered suggestions on its previous owner. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Probable Genre(s) == | == Probable Genre(s) == | ||
Realistic | [[WorksCited|'''Harbage''']] offers "Realistic Trag. (?)"; another option is domestic drama. <br> <br> | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Ben Jonson writes, in an annotation to his ''Masque of Queenes'' (1609), on witches making pictures of their victims in wax, etc.:<br> | Ben Jonson writes, in an annotation to his ''Masque of Queenes'' (1609), on witches making pictures of their victims in wax, etc.:<br> | ||
<blockquote>''Bodin''... hath... much of the witches later practise in that kind, and reports a relation of a ''French Ambassadours'', out of ''England'', of certaine pictures of wax found in a dunghill, neere Islington, of our late ''Queenes'', which rumor I my selfe (being then very younge) can yet remember to haue bene current. (B2r, n.)</blockquote> | <blockquote>''Bodin''... hath... much of the witches later practise in that kind, and reports a relation of a ''French Ambassadours'', out of ''England'', of certaine pictures of wax found in a dunghill, neere Islington, of our late ''Queenes'', which rumor I my selfe (being then very younge) can yet remember to haue bene current. (B2r, n.)</blockquote> | ||
It has been suggested that it was on this episode that the play was based. Fleay writes: | It has been suggested that it was on this episode that the play was based. [[WorksCited|'''Fleay''']] writes: "This must have afforded the plot to ''The Witch of Islington''" ('''[[WorksCited|''BCED'' II, 4-5]]'''). The supposed attack on the Queen took place in 1578 (Sharpe, 45). | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
== Works Cited == | == Works Cited == | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Adams, H. H. ''English Domestic Or, Homiletic Tragedy 1575 to 1642''. New York: Benjamin Blom, Inc., 1943. Print | <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Adams, H. H. ''English Domestic Or, Homiletic Tragedy 1575 to 1642''. New York: Benjamin Blom, Inc., 1943. Print.</div> <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Herrington, H. W. “Witchcraft and Magic in the Elizabethan Drama”. ''The Journal of American Folklore'' 32.126 (1919): 447–85. Print. [http://www.archive.org/stream/journalamerican80socigoog#page/n472/mode/2up Web].</div> <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Jonson, B. ''The Masque of Queenes''. London: Nicholas Okes for R. Bonian and H. Wally, 1609. Print. [http://gateway.proquest.com.ezproxy.sussex.ac.uk/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2003&res_id=xri:eebo&rft_id=xri:eebo:citation:99844873 Web (EEBO)]; [http://books.google.com/books?id=7q7TAAAAMAAJ&dq=jonson%20the%20masque%20of%20queens&pg=PA682#v=onepage&q&f=false web (ed. W. Gifford, 1855, Google Books)].</div> | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Sharpe, J. ''Instruments of Darkness - Witchcraft in Early Modern England''. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996. Print.</div> | <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Sharpe, J. ''Instruments of Darkness - Witchcraft in Early Modern England''. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996. Print.</div> | ||
<br><br><br> Site created and maintained by [[Simon Davies]], University of Sussex; updated 13 May 2011. | <br><br><br> Site created and maintained by [[Simon Davies]], University of Sussex; updated 13 May 2011. | ||
[[Category:Admiral's]] [[Category:All]] [[Category:Witch]] | [[Category:Admiral's]] [[Category:All]] [[Category:Witch]][[Category:Update]] | ||
[[category:Simon Davies]][[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:London]] | [[category:Simon Davies]][[category:Henslowe's records]][[category:London]] | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 3 October 2019
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)
| [July 1597] | 14 | tt at the wiche of Jslyngton | 01— | 07— | 02-00-00 |
(marginal note: "marten slather went for the company of my lord admeralles men the 18 of July 1597")
| [July 1597] | 28 | tt at the wiche of Jselyngton | 01— | 08— | 00-13-00 |
Theatrical Provenance
The play first appears in theatrical records in repertorial listings for the Admiral's men in July 1597. Because the play was not marked with Henslowe's "ne," characteristic of new plays, scholars have assigned it a dating range of 1590-1597 but not offered suggestions on its previous owner.
Probable Genre(s)
Harbage offers "Realistic Trag. (?)"; another option is domestic drama.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Ben Jonson writes, in an annotation to his Masque of Queenes (1609), on witches making pictures of their victims in wax, etc.:
Bodin... hath... much of the witches later practise in that kind, and reports a relation of a French Ambassadours, out of England, of certaine pictures of wax found in a dunghill, neere Islington, of our late Queenes, which rumor I my selfe (being then very younge) can yet remember to haue bene current. (B2r, n.)
It has been suggested that it was on this episode that the play was based. Fleay writes: "This must have afforded the plot to The Witch of Islington" (BCED II, 4-5). The supposed attack on the Queen took place in 1578 (Sharpe, 45).
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
H. W. Herrington posits a “dramatic vogue” for witchcraft plays in the late 1590s (478), and, after discussing Mother Redcap, writes:
Earlier in the same year [1597] Henslowe notes a performance of "The Witch of Islington." By the next year had been written "Black Joan." The former was either an out-and-out witch play, or else such a play with political bearings. The latter, in all probability, was a witch play also. If we may judge from the titles and the growing realism of dramatic treatment, they were of a kind far closer to actual life than those hitherto considered. (478)
Adams suggests that Henslowe's omission of 'ne' (i.e. new) in the diary entries indicates that it was a revival of an old play (95).
See also Wiggins serial number 978.
For What It's Worth
(Information welcome)
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Simon Davies, University of Sussex; updated 13 May 2011.