Titus and Gisippus: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
 
<br><br>
 
See also [[WorksCited|Wiggins]] serial number 609.
<br><br><br>


==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==

Revision as of 17:21, 6 February 2013

Anon. (1577)


Historical Records

<Reproduce relevant documentary evidence from historical records here. (For example, entries from Henslowe's Diary).>


Theatrical Provenance

<Enter information about which company performed the play, and where/when it was performed, etc.>


Probable Genre(s)

<List possible genres of the play: if noted by a critic, cite them, e.g. "Comedy (Harbage)". If an original speculation, simply list the genre.>


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

The story originates in the Decameron, but is also given in full by Thomas Elyot, The boke named the Gouernour, deuysed by syr Thomas Elyot knight (1537), ff.136v-152.


References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>

See also Wiggins serial number 609.


For What It's Worth

<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>


Works Cited

Elyot, Thomas. The boke named the Gouernour, deuysed by syr Thomas Elyot knight. 1537. Print.


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>


Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.