Osric: Difference between revisions
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
'''Gurr''', following Greg's offhand observation, repeats a possible link of "Osric" with the later lost play, "[[Marshal Osric|Marshal Osric]]," adding the conjecture that the 1602 play was "a rewrite" of the Admiral's 1597 play (p. 227, #64, n.63). | '''Gurr''', following Greg's offhand observation, repeats a possible link of "Osric" with the later lost play, "[[Marshal Osric|Marshal Osric]]," adding the conjecture that the 1602 play was "a rewrite" of the Admiral's 1597 play (p. 227, #64, n.63). | ||
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'' (#867)]] offers three Anglo-Saxon kings named "Osric" who might have been on the mind of the playwright of "Osric": Osric of Deira, A.D. 625-35; Osric of Northumberland, A.D. 718-29; and Osbert, c. 849-63. | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 23 August 2022
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 26 (Greg 1.51):
ffebreary | ||||||||
1597 | ||||||||
Candelmaseday | ||||||||
|3| | tt at oserycke. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 01|09|03-02-01 | ||||||
Shrove mvnday | |7| | —— | tt at oserycke. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | 00|14|07-16-00 | ||||
Theatrical Provenance
There is no doubt that a play Henslowe called "Osric" belonged to the Admiral's men during the late winter of 1597, but there is also no evidence to mark its introduction to the stage and identify its initial company owners. This title disappears from theater records after its brief appearance in February 1597.
Probable Genre(s)
History
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
No one has identified an historical or literary character who is persuasively the Osric for whom the play was named; consequently no source material has been suggested as the basis of the dramatic narrative. Wiggins considers several Anglo-Saxon kings, but acknowledges that "the relative dearth of specific narrative about them" is a problem (Catalogue, #867)
References to the Play
Information welcome.
Critical Commentary
Without a plausible historical or literary character named "Osric," scholars have been inclined to identify the play with another title. Malone does not offer an opinion (p. 299), nor does Collier (p. 85). Fleay, however, suggests A Knack to Know a Knave, which contains a character named Osric (BCED, 2.301 [#147]). Greg II rejects that connection, offering with tepid interest "another play on the same story" as A Knack to Know a Knave "of which a fragment survives in MS" as well as the also lost "Marshal Osric," which was written for Worcester's company in 1602 by Thomas Heywood and Wentworth Smith (#101, p. 182; #265, p. 230).
Gurr, following Greg's offhand observation, repeats a possible link of "Osric" with the later lost play, "Marshal Osric," adding the conjecture that the 1602 play was "a rewrite" of the Admiral's 1597 play (p. 227, #64, n.63).
Wiggins, Catalogue (#867) offers three Anglo-Saxon kings named "Osric" who might have been on the mind of the playwright of "Osric": Osric of Deira, A.D. 625-35; Osric of Northumberland, A.D. 718-29; and Osbert, c. 849-63.
For What It's Worth
Wiggins, Catalogue (#867) points out, "Osric" belongs to the set of apparently old plays brought to the stage briefly by the Admiral's men without a hint of their previous stage lives (those other plays are "The Grecian Comedy," #785; "Martin Swarte," #953; "Diocletian," #973; and "Time's Triumph," #1022). As he observes ruefully, "no single hypothesis [on their provenance] will necessarily cover them all."
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 19 November 2019.