Harefield Entertainment: Difference between revisions
(Authorship) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
The attribution of the entertainment to John Davies is based on the ascription of the Lottery section ('''3''') to "I.D." in Davison's ''Poetical Rapsodie'' (1608), where it appears between two other poems attributed to "Iohn Davys." (On Davies's poems in the various editions of ''A Poetical Rapsodie'', see [https://archive.org/stream/complete01davi#page/n113/mode/2up Grosart cvi-cx]; Krueger and Nemser 431-34.) Grosart assigned the entire entertainment to Davies on the basis of its internal consistency and parallels with his other works ([https://archive.org/stream/complete01davi#page/n119/mode/2up cxiii-cxvi]). Although Chambers found Grosart "hardly justified" in attributing the whole entertainment to Davies (''ES'' 4:68), Krueger found Grosart's arguments "entirely convincing" (410). Davies had a well-documented connection to the Egertons and was an active writer of similar entertainments around the same time (Heaton, ''Harefield Entertainment'', 178). | The attribution of the entertainment to John Davies is based on the ascription of the Lottery section ('''3''') to "I.D." in Davison's ''Poetical Rapsodie'' (1608), where it appears between two other poems attributed to "Iohn Davys." (On Davies's poems in the various editions of ''A Poetical Rapsodie'', see [https://archive.org/stream/complete01davi#page/n113/mode/2up Grosart cvi-cx]; Krueger and Nemser 431-34.) Grosart assigned the entire entertainment to Davies on the basis of its internal consistency and parallels with his other works ([https://archive.org/stream/complete01davi#page/n119/mode/2up cxiii-cxvi]). Although Chambers found Grosart "hardly justified" in attributing the whole entertainment to Davies (''ES'' 4:68), Krueger found Grosart's arguments "entirely convincing" (410). Davies had a well-documented connection to the Egertons and was an active writer of similar entertainments around the same time (Heaton, ''Harefield Entertainment'', 178). | ||
That John Lyly should have had a hand in the entertainment stems from Collier's forgery of an account by Arthur Mainwaring, in which Collier included a payment to Lyly's man for bringing the lottery box to Harefield ([https://archive.org/stream/egertonpapers00camduoft#page/342/mode/2up Collier 343]). It was based this evidence that Bond included the Harefield Entertainment in his edition of Lyly. | That John Lyly should have had a hand in the entertainment stems from Collier's forgery of an account by Arthur Mainwaring, in which Collier included a payment to Lyly's man for bringing the lottery box to Harefield ([https://archive.org/stream/egertonpapers00camduoft#page/342/mode/2up Collier 343]). It was based this evidence that Bond included the Harefield Entertainment in his edition of Lyly. However, while acknowledging Collier's forgery, Erler nevertheless favored Lyly as the author of the entertainment's prose speeches based on the ascription to Lyly of two similar speeches that were performed before the Queen on 28 and 29 July at Chiswick House (Erler 362; cf. Wiggins 390). | ||
Revision as of 15:04, 12 January 2015
John Davies (& John Lyly?) (1602)
This page is under construction.
Historical Records
Textual Witnesses
While no complete text of the Harefield Entertainment survives, various fragments are preserved in several early manuscript and print witnesses, depicting five discrete events that took place during the Queen's visit: (1) a dialogue between a Bailiff and a Dairymaid as the Queen first approached the Harefield grounds; (2) a dialogue between Time and Place upon the Queen's arrival at the house; (3) a Mariner's song and lottery; (4) a letter about St. Swithin and Iris that accompanied the presentation of a rainbow gown to the Queen; and (5) Place's farewell upon the Queen's departure. (Numeration of the scenes follows Wiggins.) A version of all of the extant scenes is readily accessible in Bond 491-504. (However, the "Complaint of the Satyres against the Nymphes" [pp. 497-98] included in Bond's copy text is now thought to be part of a different entertainment.) For a more recent, reliable, and comprehensively edited text, see Heaton, The Harefield Entertainment.
Manuscript
Fragments of the Harefield Entertainment were widely disseminated and have been preserved in a greater number of manuscript witnesses than any other Elizabethan entertainment. (These are listed in McGee and Meagher 147-51; Wiggins 390-91; and are discussed in Heaton, "Elizabethan Entertainments in Manuscript," 234-43.) The MSS usually reproduce one or several of discrete portions of the entertainment. Numeration of the scenes and sigla for MSS below follow Wiggins, with links to Beal's CELM. For descriptions of the scenes, see Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues below.
A | British Library, Add. MS 22601. [DaJ 292] | |
Includes part of 3 (ff. 49r-51r); edited in Halliwell 5-10. | ||
A2* | British Library, Add. MS 24665. [DaJ 296] | |
Includes a musical setting of part of 3 (ff. 19v-20r). | ||
B | West Yorkshire Archive Service, Bradford, 32D86/21 | |
Includes 5; transcribed from T. | ||
C | Folger, MS X.d.172. (The Conway MS.) [DaJ 291] | |
Includes 3 and 4 (ff. 4v-6r); edited in Cunningham 65-75. | ||
Facsimile of f. 5r on Folger Digital Images. | ||
F | Folger, MS Z.e.28. [DaJ 294] | |
Includes 1-2 and 5 (Part II, ff. 102r-3v). | ||
H | North Yorkshire Record Office, ZAZ 75. (The Hutton MS.) [DaJ 290.8] | |
Includes 2–5 (1286/8282-89); edited in Raine 278-86. | ||
K | National Archives, Kew, SP 12/285. [DaJ 290.5] | |
Includes 5 (f. 158). (Also includes part of 3 in a modern copy.) | ||
M | British Library, Harley MS 5353. (John Manningham's Diary.) [DaJ 293.] | |
Includes part of 3 and a short extract from 1 (f. 95r-v); edited in Sorlien 180-82. | ||
N | Warwickshire County Record Office, CR 136/B2455. (The Newdigate MS.) [DaJ 290] | |
Includes 1-2 and 4-5; a 1803 transcript of the MS was edited in Nichols 586-95 (and Bond 491-504). | ||
Q | The Queen's College, Oxford, MS 130. [DaJ 294.5] | |
Includes 2 and 5, with part of 3 (pp. 86-88). | ||
T | Lambeth Palace Library, MS 3201. [DaJ 297] | |
Includes 5; edited in Lodge 3:132. | ||
Y | Yale, Osborn MS fb 9. [DaJ 295] | |
Includes 2 and 5 (ff. 40r-41v). | ||
- *Siglum not used by Wiggins.
Robert Jones's Vltimvm Vale (1605). [STC 14738.] | ||
Includes a musical setting of part of 3 (sig. E2v). | ||
Francis Davison's A Poetical Rapsodie (1608). [STC 6374.] | ||
Includes part of 3 (pp. 4-8); reprinted 1611 and 1621 |
Correspondence
1. Sir Thomas Edmondes to Gilbert Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, 3 August 1602
- Her Highnes hath ben verie honorablie enterteyned at my Lord Keeper's house, and manie tymes richelie presented; yett all men are not confident that the same will procure an abolition of former unkindnes.
- (Lambeth Palace Library, MS 3203, f. 69; qtd. Lodge 3:135)
2. Sir William Browne to Sir Robert Sidney, 12 August 1602
- I send you the Queen's entertainment at Cheswick and at my Lord Keeper's; I have gotten them copied out for you.
- (Centre for Kentish Studies, U1475 C8/135; calendared HMC, De L'Isle and Dudley, 2.534)
3. Sir George Savile to Gilbert Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, 14 August 1602
- In this Inclosed your lordship maye see the manier of presentinge the giftes which weare many. and great. The Iewell my lord keper presented was held Richly worth 1000.li as I was credibly told. Another Iewell said worth vj C.li And the Gowne of Raynbows very Riche embraidrid."
- (Nottinghamshire Record Office, Savile Papers, MS DDSR 1/D/14, f. 26; qtd. Erler, "Sir John Davies," 363.)
4. "Anthony Rivers" to Robert Parsons, 25 August 1602
- "The progress of her Majesty was soon at a stay. After she had been most royally entertained and feasted at the Lord Keepers his charge in that behalf, amounting to about 4,000 li, passing further into Oxfordshire, the weather and ways proving foul, a[n]d the country murmuring to be hindered from their harvest business, by persuasion of some of the Council she suddenly returned to a standing house at Oatlands…"
5. Matthew Hutton, Archbishop of York to Edmund Sheffield, 3rd Baron Sheffield, 30 August 1602
- As for hir Majestie's entertainment at my Lord Keeper's house, I am glad to heare it was to hir good likinge and best contentment; and (in deede) it could not be otherwise, ffor, besides the loyall and chearefull harts of the master of the house and his good ladie (well knowne to hir Highnes before, and then speciallie shewed), two of the first creatures that ever God made, and so now two of th' ouldest, Time and Place, forgetting their yeres, 5564, did (as it were) caste awaie their crutches and frame themselves to the present worlde to speake placentia, concurring, consenting, and conspiring to cheare and solace hir Highnes, by whose wise and happie government bothe time and place themselves have bene much graced. These two are verie nere of kinne to two oulde predicaments as ould as them selves, quando et ubi, which I praie God may allwaies and everie where likewise concurr to serve her Majestie; that, whensoever and wheresoever shee taketh anie thinge in hand, God's holie hande and powerfull spirit may direct it to his glorie, and hir happines and comforte, bothe in this world and in the world to come.
- (North Yorkshire Record Office, ZAZ 1286/8290; qtd. Raine 167-68)
6. John Chamberlain to Dudley Carleton, 19 November 1602
- I send you here the Quenes entertainment at the Lord Kepers; yf you have seen or heard yt alredy yt is but so much labour lost.
- (SP 12/285, f. 150r; qtd. McClure 1:173)
7. Carleton to Chamberlain, 12 December 1602
- …I make the more hast to thacnk you for it, and the Inclosed which were great nouelties: but for my Lord keepers deuises he might haue kept them to himself vnles they had bin better. for all here find so little tast in them that they Judge the autor striude to be dull and ridiculous, as if it were quanto
meliusueterius, tanto melius.
- (SP 78/47 f. 234r)
8. Chamberlain to Carleton, 23 December 1602
- You like the Lord Kepers devises so yll, that I cared not to get Master Secretaries that were not much better, saving a pretty dialogue of John Davies twixt a maide, a widow and a wife…
- (SP 12/286 f.38v; qtd. McClure 1:177-78)
Theatrical Provenance
Performed for the Queen during her visit to Harefield House, Middlesex, where she was hosted by the Lord Keeper Sir Thomas Egerton and his wife Alice, Countess Dowager of Derby, from 31 July to 2 August 1602.
Probable Genre(s)
Royal Entertainment (Harbage).
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
The extant fragments provide accounts of five discrete events that took place during the Queen's visit. Numeration of the scenes follows Wiggins.
- 1. Saturday, 31 July. Upon the Queen's arrival at Harefield, she was greeted by a Bailiff, who had come to usher the company to the house, and a Dairymaid, who welcomed the "strangers" to the Egertons' modest accommodations ("but a Pigeon-house"), with the promise of rustic dining. Due to the rain, the still-mounted Queen heard this dialogue while sheltered underneath a tree.
- 2. Saturday, 31 July. After the Queen dismounted and approached Harefield, she encountered Place and Time (the latter holding an hourglass "stopped, not runninge"), who discussed the apparent impossibility of the Queen's magnificence occupying so little a physical space, as well as her ability to make time itself stand still. Time gave Place a crystal heart to present to the Queen. (This section seems to have been subject to revision before performance, as suggested by the omission of approximately twenty lines of dialogue from some MSS.)
- 3. Saturday, 31 July (?). A mariner approached the Queen with a box, singing in praise of "Cynthia Queene of Seas and lands," whom Fortune is eager to serve lavishly. He presented a chest of recently discovered booty, and the ladies present drew lots for prizes. The Queen received Fortune's wheel; the rest won trinkets such as a mask, a necklace, or a fan, while some drew blanks. (This may have taken place on Sunday, 1 August rather than Saturday; however, a Saturday performance is indicated in A [Erler 361].)
- 4. Monday, 2 August (?). The Queen was presented with a rainbow gown by a woman (probably Lady Walsingham) and an accompanying poem ("Beauties rose, and Vertues booke") that offered an explanation for the bad weather in order to exonerate St. Swithin. (Rain on St. Swithin's Day, July 15, was supposed to bode more of the same for forty days.) Rather than the saint himself weeping from the heavens, the poem explains that Iris who had come to his feast was the cause of the rain. After the goddess refused to depart, St. Swithin stole her rainbow gown to offer it to the Queen, who knows "better how to raine." (In H, this precedes 3.)
- 5. Monday, 2 August. As the Queen departed Harefield House, Place appeared in mourning clothes to bid a sad farewell, while acknowledging that "it is against the nature of an Angell to be circumscribed in Place, so it is against the nature of Place to haue the motion of an Angell."
References to the Play
(Content welcome.)
Critical Commentary
Authorship
The attribution of the entertainment to John Davies is based on the ascription of the Lottery section (3) to "I.D." in Davison's Poetical Rapsodie (1608), where it appears between two other poems attributed to "Iohn Davys." (On Davies's poems in the various editions of A Poetical Rapsodie, see Grosart cvi-cx; Krueger and Nemser 431-34.) Grosart assigned the entire entertainment to Davies on the basis of its internal consistency and parallels with his other works (cxiii-cxvi). Although Chambers found Grosart "hardly justified" in attributing the whole entertainment to Davies (ES 4:68), Krueger found Grosart's arguments "entirely convincing" (410). Davies had a well-documented connection to the Egertons and was an active writer of similar entertainments around the same time (Heaton, Harefield Entertainment, 178).
That John Lyly should have had a hand in the entertainment stems from Collier's forgery of an account by Arthur Mainwaring, in which Collier included a payment to Lyly's man for bringing the lottery box to Harefield (Collier 343). It was based this evidence that Bond included the Harefield Entertainment in his edition of Lyly. However, while acknowledging Collier's forgery, Erler nevertheless favored Lyly as the author of the entertainment's prose speeches based on the ascription to Lyly of two similar speeches that were performed before the Queen on 28 and 29 July at Chiswick House (Erler 362; cf. Wiggins 390).
(Content welcome: see Works Cited.)
For What It's Worth
(Content welcome.)
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Misha Teramura, Harvard University; updated 12 January 2015.