Talk:Lucretia: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Sounds good, John! -David | Sounds good, John! -David | ||
Still in progress. Need to develop a firmer structure for the sources and analogues section and reformat the footnotes from quick parentheticals to full citations. Will work more on this as I have time. --[[User:John Kuhn|John Kuhn]] 22:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Fine by us --- and content is looking interesting so far! From the point of view of standardisation across the database though, please do reinstate the template's subheadings throughout the entry, even if you end up putting "(information welcome)" under a heading. --[[User:David McInnis|David McInnis]] 15:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:27, 26 July 2011
I'm going to be working on this for the next week, just FYI. Basic plan is to discuss its probable links to other iterations of the Lucrece story, including Heywood's Rape of Lucrece and the broader genre of "rape tragedy." --John Kuhn 20:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Sounds good, John! -David
Still in progress. Need to develop a firmer structure for the sources and analogues section and reformat the footnotes from quick parentheticals to full citations. Will work more on this as I have time. --John Kuhn 22:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Fine by us --- and content is looking interesting so far! From the point of view of standardisation across the database though, please do reinstate the template's subheadings throughout the entry, even if you end up putting "(information welcome)" under a heading. --David McInnis 15:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)