Bee, The: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===The Burn transcript of Herbert's Office-Book=== | ===The Burn transcript of Herbert's Office-Book=== | ||
The only record of this play is its Revels license, allowed by Sir Henry Herbert. Herbert's Office-book is lost, and survives only in various partial transcripts. In 1996, N. W. Bawcutt published new records deriving from a hitherto overlooked transcript, made by the nineteenth-century scholar Jacob Henry Burn, ''Collections Toward Forming a History of the Now Obsolete Master of the Revels''. These records include the only known record of licensing of ''The Bee'': | The only record of this play is its Revels license, allowed by Sir Henry Herbert. Herbert's Office-book is lost, and survives only in various partial transcripts. In 1996, N. W. Bawcutt published new records deriving from a hitherto overlooked transcript, made by the nineteenth-century scholar Jacob Henry Burn, ''Collections Toward Forming a History of the Now Obsolete Master of the Revels''. These records include the only known record of licensing of ''The Bee'': | ||
<br><br> | |||
:The ''Bee'', a New play, written by Rowley. Alld 6 Sept. 1624 | :The ''Bee'', a New play, written by Rowley. Alld 6 Sept. <br> | ||
:1624 I''li''. For the King's Company. | |||
(Bawcutt, ''Control and Censorship'', entry 120. | <br> | ||
[[image:Burn Transcript 1467725 Bee sml.jpg|link=http://brbl-zoom.library.yale.edu/viewer/1467725]]<br> | |||
:(Jacob Henry Burn, "Collection towards forming a history of the now obsolete office of the Master of the Revells", [1874], p.194. James Marshall and Marie-Louise Osborn Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Reproduced with permission). See also Bawcutt, ''Control and Censorship'', entry 120. | |||
<br>[[category:Beinecke]] | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
==Theatrical Provenance== | ==Theatrical Provenance== | ||
Herbert's license attributes the play to the King's Men. | Herbert's license attributes the play to the King's Men. | ||
==Probable Genre(s)== | ==Probable Genre(s)== | ||
Unknown. | Unknown. | ||
| Line 41: | Line 37: | ||
==Critical Commentary== | ==Critical Commentary== | ||
Bawcutt argues that the "Rowley" who wrote the play is more likely William than Samuel, since Rowley was performing with the King's Men at the time (155, n.120) | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
==For What It's Worth== | ==For What It's Worth== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 49: | ||
==Works Cited== | ==Works Cited== | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
[[category:King's]] [[category:all]] [[category:Herbert's records]] [[category:Burn transcript]][[category:David Nicol]] | |||
Site created and maintained by [[David Nicol]], Dalhousie University; updated 29 June, 2010. Image added 28 March 2016. | |||
Site created and maintained by [[David Nicol]], Dalhousie University; updated 29 June, 2010. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:42, 31 March 2016
Historical Records
The Burn transcript of Herbert's Office-Book
The only record of this play is its Revels license, allowed by Sir Henry Herbert. Herbert's Office-book is lost, and survives only in various partial transcripts. In 1996, N. W. Bawcutt published new records deriving from a hitherto overlooked transcript, made by the nineteenth-century scholar Jacob Henry Burn, Collections Toward Forming a History of the Now Obsolete Master of the Revels. These records include the only known record of licensing of The Bee:
- The Bee, a New play, written by Rowley. Alld 6 Sept.
- 1624 Ili. For the King's Company.
- (Jacob Henry Burn, "Collection towards forming a history of the now obsolete office of the Master of the Revells", [1874], p.194. James Marshall and Marie-Louise Osborn Collection, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University. Reproduced with permission). See also Bawcutt, Control and Censorship, entry 120.
Theatrical Provenance
Herbert's license attributes the play to the King's Men.
Probable Genre(s)
Unknown.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Unknown.
References to the Play
None.
Critical Commentary
Bawcutt argues that the "Rowley" who wrote the play is more likely William than Samuel, since Rowley was performing with the King's Men at the time (155, n.120)
For What It's Worth
The word "bee" was sometimes used in the early modern era to refer to a busy worker (OED 11.b.); this is the only clue as to the play's subject matter.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by David Nicol, Dalhousie University; updated 29 June, 2010. Image added 28 March 2016.