Earl of Hertford, The: Difference between revisions
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Play | {{Play | ||
|dramatists=Anon | |dramatists=Anon. | ||
|year=1602 | |year=1602 | ||
| | |company=Admiral's | ||
|themes=Domestic politics | |themes=Domestic politics | ||
|probableGenres=History | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Historical Records == | == Historical Records == | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
== Probable Genre(s) == | == Probable Genre(s) == | ||
<!-- This template outputs the probable genres entered in the data section above. You can replace this comment and the line below if you'd like to write about the probable genres in more detail --> | <!-- This template outputs the probable genres entered in the data section above. You can replace this comment and the line below if you'd like to write about the probable genres in more detail --> | ||
History [[WorksCited|Harbage]] | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
Latest revision as of 13:09, 29 July 2022
Historical Records
Payments to Miscellaneous Craftsmen (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 107v (Greg I, 170)
- Lent vnto the company 1602 to }
- paye ther billes for tayllers & others } xxxijs
- for the new playe of the earlle of }
- Harfurd the some of }
In the margin, preceding the entry of payment to the craftsmen, Henslowe entered the following:
- totalles
- li — s — d
- 718 — 12 — 00
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's company acquired the play at the start of their second full year at the Fortune playhouse.
Probable Genre(s)
History Harbage
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Information welcome.
References to the Play
Information welcome.
Critical Commentary
Greg II does not offer any details on the provenance of this play or its narrative.
Gurr does not list "The Earl of Hertford: among the plays acquired by the Admiral's men, but he does note the tally of payments to the craftsmen, adding that the unrelated mention of the play for which the company spent 32s. might be for "an unnamed play from Herford's Men, or … a play about the earl, the queen's cousin" (266, n135).
Wiggins, Catalogue, considering the possible earls of Hertford who might have been part of sufficiently interesting historical action to be the subject of a play, offers "Edward Seymour, who became Edward VI's first Lord Protector" and had a role in the "Anglo-Scottish war of 1544-51" (#1347). Wiggins is persuaded in part because of the proximity in the repertory c. 1602 of contemporary history plays such as the serials on Thomas Wolsey and Lady Jane. "The Earl of Hertford," then, might have continued "an early Tudor history cycle."
For What It's Worth
Information welcome.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 14 June 2019.