Thomas Merry (Beech's Tragedy): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
If | If T''he Tragedy of Thomas Merry'' was a discrete text from the play folded into the tragedy of "''a young childe mur''thered in a Wood by two Ruffins, ''with the consent of his Vncle''" ([[Orphans' Tragedy, The|The Orphans' Tragedy]]), the play called "the murder of Mai''ste''r Beech ''a Chaundler in'' Thames street, and his boye, done by ''Thomas Merry''" is a dramatic analogue. | ||
== References to the Play == | == References to the Play == | ||
None known. | |||
== Critical Commentary == | == Critical Commentary == | ||
Two issues drive the commentary on The Tragedy of Thomas Merry. One is the identity of | Two issues drive the commentary on ''The Tragedy of Thomas Merry''. One is the identity of Rob. Yarington, whose name appears in the authorial position on the title page of ''Two Lamentable Tragedies'' (1601). Fleay believed that "Yarington was a fictitious name" (2.286). Greg calls Yarington a scribe (II.209, Item 190). R. A. Law argues that he is the author of the composite plays as printed. | ||
The other is the relationship of first of the two plays in ''Two Lamentable Tragedies'' to the play for which the Admiral’s Men paid Haughton and Day £5 in 1599. Fleay, having decided that Yarington was fictitious, explained ''Two Lamentable Tragedies'' as a publication put together by Chettle "consolidating the two plays" of ''Thomas Merry'' and ''The Orphans' Tragedy'' (2.286). Greg argues that the combined printing of two plays means "much matter must have been omitted" (II.209, Item 190). He can find no trace of Day's hand in the printed scenes and characterizes the "Merry" parts as "written in an extraordinary wooden bombast of grotesque commonplace" (II.209, Item 190). On the whole, his opinion seems to be that the Haughton-Day play was significantly different from that published under Yarington's name. | |||
See [[Orphans' Tragedy, The|''The Orphans Tragedy'']] for which Henry Chettle was paid 10s. on 27 November 1599 and 10s. on 24 September 1601 for further details on the play described as the story “a young childe murthered in a Wood by two Ruffins, with the consent of his Vnckle” on the title page of ''Two Lamentable Tragedies'' (1601). See also [[Italian Tragedy, The|''The Italian Tragedy'']], for which John Day was paid 40s. on 10 January 1600, for commentary on how Fleay and Greg mix it in with the identity of ''The Orphans' Tragedy''. | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 153: | Line 159: | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Knutson, Roslyn L. “Toe to Toe Across Maid Lane: : Repertorial Competition at the Rose and Globe, 1599-1600,” in June Schlueter and Paul Nelsen (eds) ''Acts of Criticism: Performance Matters in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries'' (Madison & Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005), 21-37. </div> | <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Knutson, Roslyn L. “Toe to Toe Across Maid Lane: : Repertorial Competition at the Rose and Globe, 1599-1600,” in June Schlueter and Paul Nelsen (eds) ''Acts of Criticism: Performance Matters in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries'' (Madison & Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005), 21-37. </div> | ||
<div style=”padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em”>Law, R. A. “Yarington’s ‘Two Lamentable Tragedies’, ''Modern Language Review'' 5 (1910)</div> | <div style=”padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em”>Law, R. A. “Yarington’s ‘Two Lamentable Tragedies’, ''Modern Language Review'' 5 (1910): 167-77.</div> | ||
Revision as of 19:23, 20 January 2010
John Day, William Haughton (1599)
Historical Records
===Henslowe's Diary===
F. 65v (Greg I.114)
- Lent vnto wm Harton the 21 novmb[er]
- in earneste of her boocke called merie
- the some of … xs
- Lent vnto wm harton & John daye the 27 of
- novmb[er] in earneste of a tragedie called
- mereie the some of … xxs
- as may a pere
F. 29 (Greg I.57)
- Receiued of mr. Henseslowe in earnest of the tragedie
- of merie the some of xxs. The 27th of noueb.
- ___________________ xxs.
- W Haughton. J D.
- Recd of Mr Hinchloe more in ernest of The
- Tragedy of Thomas Merrye 20s
- Joh. Day.
- W Haughton
- Recd more of mr Hinchloe vpon the same booke 10s
- By John Day.
F. 66 (Greg I.115)
- Lent vnto wm hawton & John day the
- 5 of desemb[er] 1599 in earneste of ther boocke
- called mereye at the apoyntment of
- Robart shawe the some of … xxs
- as may a pere
- Lent vnto John daye the 6 desemb[er]
- 1599 in earneste [called] of a Boocke called
- merye [the] as maye a pere … xs
- pd vnto wm hawghton & John daye the
- 6 of desemb[er] 1599 in full payment of ther
- boocke called the tragedie of merie the some of … xxxxs
F. 67 (Greg I.117)
- pd vnto the mr of the Revelles man for
- lycen[c]singe of a Boocke called Beches
- tragedie the some of … viijs
Stationers' Register
Arber, 2.658
29. Augusti. [1594]
- Thomas Gosson. Thomas Millington. Thomas Da[w]son./
Entred for theire Copie vnder th[e h]andes of both the wardens, A booke entytuled, A true discourse of a most cruell and barbarous murther comitted by one THOMAS MERREY, on the persons of ROBERTE BEECHE and THOMAS WINCHESTER his servaunt. on ffridaie night the 23th . of August. beinge Bartholomue Eve. 1594. Together with the order of his array[g]nement and execucon. ... vjd
29. Augusti. [1594]
- Thomas Millington. Thomas Gosson. and Thomas Da[w]son.
Entred for theire Copie vnder th[e h]andes of the wardeins a ballad entituled. B[E]ECHE his ghoste. Complayninge on ye wofull murder committed on him and THOMAS WINCHESTER his servaunt. ... vjd
.3d. Septembris./.[1594]
- John Danter./l
Entred for his Copie vnder th[e h]andes of Master WILBRAHAM and Master Binge a ballad entituled a lamentable ballad describing the wofull murder of ROBERT BEECHE &c Master Dawood havinge likewise sett to his hande for further warraunt ... vjd
7d. Septembris./. [1594]
- Thomas Gosson/ Thomas Myllington/
Entred for their copie vnder the wardens handes, a ballad intituled/ the pitifull lamentacon of RACHELL MERRYE whoo suffred in Smithfeild with her brother THOMAS MERRYE the vjth of September 1594/ ...vjd
7d. Septembris./. [1594]
- Thomas Gosson
Entred for his Copie vnder th[e h]and of bothe the wardens a ballad entituled the lamentable ende of THOMAS MERRYE and RACHELL HIS SISTER ... vjd
9d die Septembris [1594]
- Thomas Millington./.
Entred for his Copie vnder th[e h]ande of Master Cawood a ballad intituled the said lamentacon of THOMAS MERRYE &c ... vjd
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's Men performed The Tragedy of Thomas Merry (or, Beech's Tragedy) at the Rose starting in the late winter of 1599-1600. It was one of several "true crime"plays acquired in response to the arrival of the Chamberlain's Men across the street at the Globe and anticipation of the move northward to the Fortune playhouse.
Probable Genre(s)
Tragedy (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
If The Tragedy of Thomas Merry was a discrete text from the play folded into the tragedy of "a young childe murthered in a Wood by two Ruffins, with the consent of his Vncle" (The Orphans' Tragedy), the play called "the murder of Maister Beech a Chaundler in Thames street, and his boye, done by Thomas Merry" is a dramatic analogue.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
Two issues drive the commentary on The Tragedy of Thomas Merry. One is the identity of Rob. Yarington, whose name appears in the authorial position on the title page of Two Lamentable Tragedies (1601). Fleay believed that "Yarington was a fictitious name" (2.286). Greg calls Yarington a scribe (II.209, Item 190). R. A. Law argues that he is the author of the composite plays as printed.
The other is the relationship of first of the two plays in Two Lamentable Tragedies to the play for which the Admiral’s Men paid Haughton and Day £5 in 1599. Fleay, having decided that Yarington was fictitious, explained Two Lamentable Tragedies as a publication put together by Chettle "consolidating the two plays" of Thomas Merry and The Orphans' Tragedy (2.286). Greg argues that the combined printing of two plays means "much matter must have been omitted" (II.209, Item 190). He can find no trace of Day's hand in the printed scenes and characterizes the "Merry" parts as "written in an extraordinary wooden bombast of grotesque commonplace" (II.209, Item 190). On the whole, his opinion seems to be that the Haughton-Day play was significantly different from that published under Yarington's name.
See The Orphans Tragedy for which Henry Chettle was paid 10s. on 27 November 1599 and 10s. on 24 September 1601 for further details on the play described as the story “a young childe murthered in a Wood by two Ruffins, with the consent of his Vnckle” on the title page of Two Lamentable Tragedies (1601). See also The Italian Tragedy, for which John Day was paid 40s. on 10 January 1600, for commentary on how Fleay and Greg mix it in with the identity of The Orphans' Tragedy.
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Keywords
London, True crime, Robert Yarington, Lamentable
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 12 December 2009.