Time's Triumph and Fortune's: Difference between revisions
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
== For What It's Worth == | == For What It's Worth == | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== Works Cited == | == Works Cited == | ||
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Gurr, Andrew. ''Shakespeare's Opposites: The Admiral's Company 1594-1625''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.</div> | <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;">Gurr, Andrew. ''Shakespeare's Opposites: The Admiral's Company 1594-1625''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.</div> |
Revision as of 11:59, 15 October 2020
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 26v (Greg I, p. 52)
Aprell 1597 |13| . . . . . . tt at times triumpe & fortus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01|05|01 — 00 — 03
Theatrical Provenance
The single appearance of "Time's Triumph" in Henslowe's records for the Admiral's men at the Rose in April 1957 is the only recorded evidence of the play's existence and theatrical provenance.
Probable Genre(s)
Moral? (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Information welcome.
References to the Play
Information welcome.
Critical Commentary
Greg II read Henslowe's "& fortus" to be "and fortune," and a more compelling suggestion has yet to be offered (#104).
Over time, the play title acquired an apostrophe "s:" Harbage, p. 52; Gurr, p. 228. Wiggins, Catalogue considers the possibility that "Fortune's" was meant to modify some word (now missing) other than "Triumph" ( #1022).
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 19 November 2019.