Search results

...ls Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (''RES'' 484). Unknown company at court (Harbage); King’s (Bentley).

|venue=Court | |||| '''The Paynters daughter''' showen at Hampton Court on S^t Stevens daie

...ls Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (''RES'' 484). <br><br>The list designated ‘D’ by Chambers (f.247) c ...on Revels Office scrap paper, were under consideration for performance at court.

|venue=Court ...count, in which it is attributed to Leicester's men, who performed both at court, in London, and in the provinces.

===Court Records=== The play is one of eleven given by the King’s Men at court through the winter holiday season of 1604-5. Having received the patronage

===Court Records=== ...ie" performed by John Symons and his fellows. Henry Evans was paid for the performance.

...ls Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (''RES'' 484). The list designated ‘B’ by Chambers (f.197<sup>v</sup ...on Revels Office scrap paper, were under consideration for performance at court.

...ls Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (''RES'' 484). <br><br>The list designated ‘D’ by Chambers (f.247) c ...on Revels Office scrap paper, were under consideration for performance at court.

===Payments for Court Performance=== [[category:all]][[category:David McInnis]][[category:court]][[category:King's]][[category:Woman's...]]

The author is unknown; William Rowley was paid for the court performance because he represented his company as payee, not because he was the author [[category:all]] [[category:Prince Charles's (I)]][[category:court]]

...d at the company's urban and provincial venues (most likely) as well as at court. ...ambers, ''ES'']] offers no opinions, but he does record its performance at court (2.88, 4.89, 147).

...in the provinces in the mid-1570s; therefore, their repertory offerings at court in these years are most likely to have been taken on the road also. They pr In addition to documenting the performance of the play itself at court, the records from the Office of the Revels include payment for the conveyan

===The cancelled performance=== ...umber of twelue, my lady Vdall, my lady Caue, my lady May &c: The Maske at Court not yett.’

|venue=Court ...London area and in the provinces for at least a year on either side of the court appearance.

...y's structure" (193). To account for this, he proposes that the 1611 court performance of ''No Wit'' may have been "an adaptation that highlighted Weatherwise" an ...consults his almanac, "might hypothetically have been added for the court performance where the play was called ''The Almanac''" (782).

...The Proxy, or Love's Aftergame'', was produced at the theatre at Salisbury Court, November 24, 1634. :1635/6, 24 Feb. ''Loves Aftergame'', played at St. James by the Salisbury Court players, the 24 of Feb. 1635.

Prince Charles's (I) Men, at court. ...ght have been sung there ''after'' a premiere at court, but finds a "first performance at the Curtain" to be "at least as likely" (6:136). However, [[Works Cited|

Although Rowley was payee for a court performance of a two-part play entitled ''The Knaves'' in 1613, there is no evidence th

The one known performance of "Alcmaeon" was at court, where it was performed by Paul's Boys under the direction of Sebastion Wes [[category:Children of Paul's]][[category:Court]][[category:Classical]][[category:Update]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[c

...ls Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (''RES'' 484). The list designated ‘D’ by Chambers (f.247) contains, Orbison observes that the date of the performance referred to is certainly between 1612 and 1619, and gives a number of reaso