Seleo and Olympo: Difference between revisions

Line 74: Line 74:
== Critical Commentary ==
== Critical Commentary ==
<br>
<br>
[[WorksCited|Malone]] considered "Seleo and Olympo" the same play as "Olympio and Eugenio," declaring that "''Seleo'' ... is in a subsequent entry called Olempo and Hengens" (p. 296, n.6).


[[WorksCited|Malone]] considered "Seleo and Olympo" the same play as "Olympio and Eugenio," declaring that "''Seleo'' ... is in a subsequent entry called Olempo and Hengens" (p. 296, n.6)
<br>


[[WorksCited|Collier]], who spelled the title "steleo and olempo," called attention to Malone's misreading of the initial name as "Seleo," then faulted "the scribe" for repeating Malone's misreading, then settling (apparently incorrectly in Collier's opinion) on Olympio as "the real name" of the play (p. 50, n.2). At the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," Collier conceded that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, Collier added that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).
[[WorksCited|Collier]], who spelled the title "steleo and olempo," called attention to Malone's misreading of the initial name as "Seleo," then faulted "the scribe" for repeating Malone's misreading, then settling (apparently incorrectly in Collier's opinion) on Olympio as "the real name" of the play (p. 50, n.2). At the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," Collier conceded that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, Collier added that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).




[[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] had "no doubt" that "Seleo and Olympo" was "the original form" of Thomas Heywood's ''The Golden Age'' (1. #2, p. 283). Bolstering his surmise, Fleay revised "Seleo" into "Coelo."   
[[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] had "no doubt" that "Seleo and Olympo" was "the original form" of Thomas Heywood's ''The Golden Age'' (1. #2, p. 283). Bolstering his surmise, Fleay revised "Seleo" into "Coelo." He itemized [[Olympio and Eugenio|"Olympio and Eugenio"]] separately (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting it from "Seleo and Olympo," but he had no further comment on its identity. In ''A Chronicle History," Fleay assigned "Seleo/Coelo and Olympo" a costume for Neptune ("j sewtte for Nepton,'' [[WorksCited|Greg, ''Papers'']], p. 114, l. 17) and a property ("Nepun forcke & garland," [[WorksCited|Greg, ''Papers'']], p. 117, l. 68).




[[WorksCited|Greg II (#70, p. 175)]] collapsed the entries in the diary for [[Olympio and Eugenio|Olympio and Eugenio]] into those for "Seleo and Olympo." He wrestled with Fleay's identification of the play as an early version of Heywood's ''Golden Age," ...
[[WorksCited|Greg II (#70, p. 175)]] collapsed the entries in the diary for [[Olympio and Eugenio|"Olympio and Eugenio"]] into those for "Seleo and Olympo." He wrestled with Fleay's identification of the play as an early version of Heywood's ''Golden Age," ...




'''Gurr''' combined the entries for "Seleo and Olympo" with those for [[Olympio and Eugenio|"Olympio and Eugenio"]], commenting only that the former was "[p]robably the play also named ''Olympio and Eugenio'' (p. 214, n.40).


'''Gurr''' combined the entries for "Seleo and Olympo" with those for [[Olympio and Eugenio|Olympio and Eugenio]], commenting only that the former was "[p]robably the play also named ''Olympio and Eugenio'' (p. 214, n.40).




 
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'', #994, #995]] reflects the inclination of previous theater historians in leaning toward the merger of "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" being the same play. Toward that merger, he finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (allowing thus for its run to appear a continuation), but he finds the consistency with which Henslowe gave the word common to both titles a consistently distinct spelling: "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one.
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'', #994, #995]] reflects the inclination of previous theater historians in leaning toward the merger of "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" being the same play. He finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (suggesting it has been staged previously), but he is troubled by the consistency with which Henslowe spelled "Olympio" for this second-appearing play.
 
<br><br>
<br><br>



Revision as of 11:47, 16 March 2021

Anon. Play Titles A (1595)Property "Paratext" (as page type) with input value "{{{paratexts}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Contributor" (as page type) with input value "{{{contributors}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Partnering Institution" (as page type) with input value "{{{partneringInstitutions}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

Historical Records

Performance Records

Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary


F. 11v (Greg I.22)
ye 5 of marche 1594 . . . . . . ne . . Rd at seleo & olempo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiill
ye 2 of maye 1595 Rd at seleo & olempa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ls
ye 9 of maye 1595 Rd at selyo & olympo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvjs


Fol. 12v (Greg I.24)
ye 1[7]9 of maye 1595 . . . . . . . . . . Rd at olimpo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxiijs
ye 29 of maye 1595 Rd at olimpo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxixs
ye 7 of June 1595 Rd at olimpio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvs



Theatrical Provenance

Probable Genre(s)

Unknown

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

References to the Play

Critical Commentary


Malone considered "Seleo and Olympo" the same play as "Olympio and Eugenio," declaring that "Seleo ... is in a subsequent entry called Olempo and Hengens" (p. 296, n.6).


Collier, who spelled the title "steleo and olempo," called attention to Malone's misreading of the initial name as "Seleo," then faulted "the scribe" for repeating Malone's misreading, then settling (apparently incorrectly in Collier's opinion) on Olympio as "the real name" of the play (p. 50, n.2). At the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," Collier conceded that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, Collier added that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).


Fleay, BCED had "no doubt" that "Seleo and Olympo" was "the original form" of Thomas Heywood's The Golden Age (1. #2, p. 283). Bolstering his surmise, Fleay revised "Seleo" into "Coelo." He itemized "Olympio and Eugenio" separately (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting it from "Seleo and Olympo," but he had no further comment on its identity. In A Chronicle History," Fleay assigned "Seleo/Coelo and Olympo" a costume for Neptune ("j sewtte for Nepton, Greg, Papers, p. 114, l. 17) and a property ("Nepun forcke & garland," Greg, Papers, p. 117, l. 68).


Greg II (#70, p. 175) collapsed the entries in the diary for "Olympio and Eugenio" into those for "Seleo and Olympo." He wrestled with Fleay's identification of the play as an early version of Heywood's Golden Age," ...


Gurr combined the entries for "Seleo and Olympo" with those for "Olympio and Eugenio", commenting only that the former was "[p]robably the play also named Olympio and Eugenio (p. 214, n.40).


Wiggins, Catalogue, #994, #995 reflects the inclination of previous theater historians in leaning toward the merger of "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" being the same play. Toward that merger, he finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (allowing thus for its run to appear a continuation), but he finds the consistency with which Henslowe gave the word common to both titles a consistently distinct spelling: "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one.

For What It's Worth

Works Cited




Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 9 February 2021.