Pompey: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:
<br>
<br>
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>


<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>


<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>
<br>
 
<br>


Site created and maintained by [[Domenico Lovascio]], University of Genoa; updated 05 July 2015.
Site created and maintained by [[Domenico Lovascio]], University of Genoa; updated 05 July 2015.
[[category:all]][[category:Domenico Lovascio]]
[[category:all]][[category:Domenico Lovascio]]

Revision as of 23:39, 8 July 2015

Anon. (1581)


Historical Records

Court Records

Accounts of the Office of the Revels

The children of Pawles { A storie of Pompey enacted in the hall on twelf nighte wheron was ymploied newe one great citty, A senate howse and eight ells of dobble sarcenet for curtens and .xviij. paire of gloves.
(Feuillerat 336)


* The duble Sarcenett maid
into Curtyns and Implowid
aboute Storie of pompay plaid
by the Childring of powles/
*Thomas Skiner
Orendge taffeta sarcenet at the xs the ell
viij. ells
} iiijli.
(Feuillerat 338)



Theatrical Provenance

Performed at Whitehall Palace by the Children of Paul's on Friday 6 January 1581.


Probable Genre(s)

Classical history (Harbage).


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>


References to the Play

<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>


Critical Commentary

<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>


For What It's Worth

Pompey was a very well-known historical personality in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England and also frequently appeared in dramatic writings... However, in all the extant early modern English plays featuring him as a character, he is always used as a foil to Caesar, and if Pompey in the title of a play, Caesar also is. This is also true of the lost play on the subject; see Caesar and Pompey, Caesar and Pompey, Part 1 and Caesar and Pompey, Part 2. This play may have therefore constituted an interesting exception to this trend by making Pompey the focal point of attention, although it appears extremely likely that Caesar also made his appearance in this play. It is also intriguing to wonder what kind of Pompey we may have encountered here, whether the glorious or the weak one... Given that he is the title character, one would expect him to have been depicted with some sort of greatness, perhaps by contrast with a hostile depiction of Caesar, especially if the play encompassed Pompey's defeat at Pharsalus and his subsequent beheading.


Works Cited

citation goes here



Site created and maintained by Domenico Lovascio, University of Genoa; updated 05 July 2015.