Charles, Duke of Bourbon: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Anon. (before 1641)
[[Anon.]] (before [[1641]])


==Historical Records==
==Historical Records==
Line 10: Line 10:


unknown
unknown




==Probable Genre(s)==
==Probable Genre(s)==


unknown
Tragedy (Stationers' Register); historical tragedy
 


==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==


==Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues==
Charles III, Duke of Bourbon (1489-1527) was a historical figure whose career provided, in the words of Greg, <i>BEPD</i>, "excellent tragic material". Charles fought as a general in the military actions of his King, Francis I of France, but the relationship was not without friction.  In particular, when Charles's wife died, he attracted the attentions of the king's mother, who pressured him to marry her instead.  Charles refused. Eventually, he rebelled against Francis, and was driven into exile in Italy as a result. There, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, in dispute with the Pope, gave him command of an army with instructions to attack and pillage Rome. This he successfully did, but was shot and killed in the final assault on the city. 


Charles III, Duke of Bourbon (1489-1527) was a historical figure whose career provided, in the words of Greg, <i>BEPD</i>, "excellent tragic material".  Charles had a difficult relationship with the French King, Francis I, which was further soured by his inconvenient refusal (on the death of his wife) to marry the king's mother.  Eventually, he rebelled against Francis, and was driven into exile in Italy as a result.  There, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, in dispute with the Pope, gave him command of an army with instructions to attack and pillage Rome.  This he successfully did, but was shot and killed in the final assault on the city. 


Serres' <i>General inuentorie</i>, 420-473, offers one fairly lengthy tellling of the above story which would have been conveniently accessible to a Jacobean or Caroline dramatist.
Serres' <i>General inuentorie</i>, 420-473, offers one fairly lengthy telling of the above story which would have been conveniently accessible to a Jacobean or Caroline dramatist.


==References to the Play==
==References to the Play==


none known
None known.




==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


Greg, <i>BEPD</i>, compares the 1597 reference to <i>[[Burbon (i.e. Bourbon%3F)]]</I>, a seemingly lost play. Bentley follows Greg, and considers the idea that the two lost plays might have been one and the same. He concludes that they were probably different plays, since "very few plays earlier than the times of James I were entered in the Stationers' Register for the first time in the 1640's".
Greg, <i>BEPD</i>, compares the 1597 reference to <i>[[Burbon (i.e. Bourbon%3F)]]</I>, a seemingly lost play. Bentley, 5.1302, follows Greg, and considers the idea that the two lost plays might have been one and the same. He concludes that they were probably different plays, since "very few plays earlier than the times of James I were entered in the Stationers' Register for the first time in the 1640's" (5.1326).
 


==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


George Chapman used Grimeston's translation of Serres as a principal source for his plays on Bussy D'Ambois. It is certainly possible that it was also mined by the anonymous author of this lost play.
George Chapman used Grimeston's translation of Serres as a principal source for his plays on Bussy D'Ambois. It is certainly possible that it was also mined by the anonymous author of this lost play.
 
John Nicholson was not a well-known printer of plays.  The only extant play he printed was "J.D."'s <i>The Knave in Grain… acted at the Fortune</i> (1640).  Is this a tenuous indication of the possible theatrical provenance of these three lost, anonymous plays?




==Keywords==
This play was registered along with two other lost plays, <i>The [[Parroiall (Pareil?) of Princes‎]]</i> and <i>[[England’s First Happiness, or The Life of St. Austin]]</i>. John Nicholson was not a well-known printer of plays.  The only extant play he printed was "J.D."'s <i>The Knave in Grain… acted at the Fortune</i> (1640). Is this a tenuous indication of the possible theatrical provenance of these three lost, anonymous plays?


History, France, Rome, Francis I, Charles V, Bourbons, Pope




[[category:France]] [[category:Rome]] [[category:Francis I]] [[category:Charles V]] [[category:Bourbons]] [[category:Pope]] [[category:Unknown]][[category:all]][[category:Stationers' Register]]


==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==
Line 52: Line 48:
Jean de Serres, <I> A general inuentorie of the history of France</i>, tr. Edward Grimeston (London, 1607).
Jean de Serres, <I> A general inuentorie of the history of France</i>, tr. Edward Grimeston (London, 1607).


Site created and maintained by --[[User:Matthew Steggle|Matthew Steggle]] 13:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC).
 
Site created and maintained by [[Matthew Steggle]], Sheffield Hallam University, 24 November 2009.[[category:Matthew Steggle]]

Latest revision as of 14:04, 10 December 2021

Anon. (before 1641)

Historical Records

Bentley, 5.1326. Stationers' Register, 15 April 1641. Entered for John Nicholson

three playes, vizt. A Tragedy called Charles, Duke of Burbon, The Parroiall of Princes & England's first happines, or, the Life of St. Austin... xviiid.


Theatrical Provenance

unknown


Probable Genre(s)

Tragedy (Stationers' Register); historical tragedy

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Charles III, Duke of Bourbon (1489-1527) was a historical figure whose career provided, in the words of Greg, BEPD, "excellent tragic material". Charles fought as a general in the military actions of his King, Francis I of France, but the relationship was not without friction. In particular, when Charles's wife died, he attracted the attentions of the king's mother, who pressured him to marry her instead. Charles refused. Eventually, he rebelled against Francis, and was driven into exile in Italy as a result. There, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, in dispute with the Pope, gave him command of an army with instructions to attack and pillage Rome. This he successfully did, but was shot and killed in the final assault on the city.


Serres' General inuentorie, 420-473, offers one fairly lengthy telling of the above story which would have been conveniently accessible to a Jacobean or Caroline dramatist.

References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

Greg, BEPD, compares the 1597 reference to Burbon (i.e. Bourbon?), a seemingly lost play. Bentley, 5.1302, follows Greg, and considers the idea that the two lost plays might have been one and the same. He concludes that they were probably different plays, since "very few plays earlier than the times of James I were entered in the Stationers' Register for the first time in the 1640's" (5.1326).


For What It's Worth

George Chapman used Grimeston's translation of Serres as a principal source for his plays on Bussy D'Ambois. It is certainly possible that it was also mined by the anonymous author of this lost play.


This play was registered along with two other lost plays, The Parroiall (Pareil?) of Princes‎ and England’s First Happiness, or The Life of St. Austin. John Nicholson was not a well-known printer of plays. The only extant play he printed was "J.D."'s The Knave in Grain… acted at the Fortune (1640). Is this a tenuous indication of the possible theatrical provenance of these three lost, anonymous plays?

Works Cited

Jean de Serres, A general inuentorie of the history of France, tr. Edward Grimeston (London, 1607).


Site created and maintained by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University, 24 November 2009.