Difference between revisions of "Alice Pierce"

Line 99: Line 99:
 
'''Malone''' (I, pt. 2, pp. 302, 307) did not offer an opinion on the identity of the title character, but '''Collier''', in a footnote to the entry recording the Admiral's purchase of material for Alice's gown on 8 December 1597, called her "the mistress to Edward III" (116n). Neither '''Fleay, ''BCED''''' (2.306, #205) nor [[WorksCited|'''Greg II''']] (p. 189, #120) repeated that identification, but it has now become widely accepted. '''Gurr''', however, does not comment on Alice's possible historical identity (he spells the surname "Pearce").
 
'''Malone''' (I, pt. 2, pp. 302, 307) did not offer an opinion on the identity of the title character, but '''Collier''', in a footnote to the entry recording the Admiral's purchase of material for Alice's gown on 8 December 1597, called her "the mistress to Edward III" (116n). Neither '''Fleay, ''BCED''''' (2.306, #205) nor [[WorksCited|'''Greg II''']] (p. 189, #120) repeated that identification, but it has now become widely accepted. '''Gurr''', however, does not comment on Alice's possible historical identity (he spells the surname "Pearce").
  
[[WorksCited|'''Wiggins, ''Catalogue''''']]
+
[[WorksCited|'''Wiggins, ''Catalogue''''']] doesn't question the identification of Alice as Edward III's mistress. Describing the plot, he emphasizes the king's public display of her at Smithfield and her theft of his rings as he lay dying. In something of an aside, he points to ''Acts and Monuments'', in which Foxe recounts an episode in which Alice got a friar's help in bewitching the king. Wiggins observes that the use of this story "would obviously have a bearing on exactly how black the play painted its title character" (#1091).
  
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>

Revision as of 14:28, 31 May 2019

Historical Records

Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)

F. 37v (Greg, I. 70)

Layd owt for the company of my lord admeralles }
men for to by tafetie & tynsell to macke a payer }
of bodeyes for a womones gowne to playe allece perce } xxs
for wch I dellyuered vnto the littell tayller Jn Redey }
money the 8 of desembʒ 1597 the some of }
wittnes E Alleyn
layd owt mor the same tyme for makynge & a payer }
of yeare sleavse of the bodeyes of pyges gowne } vjs vijd
lente vnto Robart shawe for to by cop lace }
of [gowne] sylver to lace a payer of hosse for alles perce } xvjs
the 10 desembʒ 1597 the some of }
wittnes wm Borne Jube
& gabrell spencer


F. 43v (Greg, I. 82)

layd owt for the companye to by tafetie & tynssell }
for the bodeyes of a womones gowne to playe allce perce } xxs
wch J dd vnto the litell tayller the 8 of desembʒ 1597 }
wittnes E Alleyn

Henslowe Papers


Greg, Papers (Appx. I, art. 1, p. 116. l. 53)

Under the heading “The Enventary of all the aparell for my Lord Admeralles men, tacken the 10 of Marche 1598. —Leaft above in the tier-house in the cheast.

Item, ... j payer of bodeyes for Alles Pearce


Greg, Papers (Appx. I, art. 1, p. 121. l. 193)

Under the heading “A Note of all suche bookes as belong to the Stocke, and such as I have bought since the 3d of Marche 1598

Alls Perce.



Theatrical Provenance

The listing of "Alls Perce" among the books Henslowe had in stock or had bought "since the 3d of March 1598," as well as the payments for apparel for the play in December of 1597, confirms acquisition by the Admiral's men. It also locates that acquisition in the wake of the breakup of Pembroke's men, who had been playing at the Swan in July 1597 and attracting unwelcome governmental attention because of one of their repertory items, "The Isle of Dogs." This coincidence influenced Greg II to assume that "Alice Pierce" had "been brought in [to the Admiral's holdings] by Pembroke's men," i.e., players including William Bird, Robert Shaa, and Gabriel Spencer (p. 187). If so, the play was performed at both the Swan and Rose playhouses in 1597-8.

Probable Genre(s)


Harbage considers the play a history, as does Wiggins (#1091)

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

x x x x x

References to the Play

Information welcome.

Critical Commentary

Malone (I, pt. 2, pp. 302, 307) did not offer an opinion on the identity of the title character, but Collier, in a footnote to the entry recording the Admiral's purchase of material for Alice's gown on 8 December 1597, called her "the mistress to Edward III" (116n). Neither Fleay, BCED (2.306, #205) nor Greg II (p. 189, #120) repeated that identification, but it has now become widely accepted. Gurr, however, does not comment on Alice's possible historical identity (he spells the surname "Pearce").

Wiggins, Catalogue doesn't question the identification of Alice as Edward III's mistress. Describing the plot, he emphasizes the king's public display of her at Smithfield and her theft of his rings as he lay dying. In something of an aside, he points to Acts and Monuments, in which Foxe recounts an episode in which Alice got a friar's help in bewitching the king. Wiggins observes that the use of this story "would obviously have a bearing on exactly how black the play painted its title character" (#1091).



For What It's Worth

Information welcome.

Works Cited




Site created and maintained by Christopher Matusiak, updated 16 March 2011. Additions by Roslyn L. Knutson 18 May 2019. Collier

Gurr

Malone