Seleo and Olympo
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
- F. 11v (Greg I.22)
ye 5 of marche 1594 . . . . . . ne . . Rd at seleo & olempo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiill ye 2 of maye 1595 Rd at seleo & olempa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ls ye 9 of maye 1595 Rd at selyo & olympo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvjs
- Fol. 12v (Greg I.24)
ye 1[7]9 of maye 1595 . . . . . . . . . . Rd at olimpo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxiijs ye 29 of maye 1595 Rd at olimpo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxixs ye 7 of June 1595 Rd at olimpio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvs
Theatrical Provenance
Probable Genre(s)
Unknown
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
References to the Play
Critical Commentary
Malone considered "Seleo and Olympo" the same play as "Olympio and Eugenio," declaring that "Seleo ... is in a subsequent entry called Olempo and Hengens" (p. 296, n.6).
Collier, who spelled the title "steleo and olempo," called attention to Malone's misreading of the initial name as "Seleo," then faulted "the scribe" for repeating Malone's misreading, then settling (apparently incorrectly in Collier's opinion) on Olympio as "the real name" of the play (p. 50, n.2). At the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," Collier conceded that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, Collier added that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).
Fleay, BCED had "no doubt" that "Seleo and Olympo" was "the original form" of Thomas Heywood's The Golden Age (1. #2, p. 283). Bolstering his surmise, Fleay revised "Seleo" into "Coelo." He itemized "Olympio and Eugenio" separately (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting it from "Seleo and Olympo," but he had no further comment on its identity. In A Chronicle History," Fleay assigned "Seleo/Coelo and Olympo" a costume for Neptune ("j sewtte for Nepton, Greg, Papers, p. 114, l. 17) and a property ("Nepun forcke & garland," Greg, Papers, p. 117, l. 68).
Greg II (#70, p. 175) collapsed the entries in the diary for "Olympio and Eugenio" into those for "Seleo and Olympo." He wrestled with Fleay's identification of the play as an early version of Heywood's Golden Age," ...
Gurr combined the entries for "Seleo and Olympo" with those for "Olympio and Eugenio", commenting only that the former was "[p]robably the play also named Olympio and Eugenio (p. 214, n.40).
Wiggins, Catalogue, #994, #995 reflects the inclination of previous theater historians in leaning toward the merger of "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" being the same play. Toward that merger, he finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (allowing thus for its run to appear a continuation), but he finds the consistency with which Henslowe gave the word common to both titles a consistently distinct spelling: "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one.
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 9 February 2021.