Bridegroom and the Madman, The
Historical Records
Cotton MS. Tiberius E. X.
In 1925 Frank Marcham transcribed and published the contents of the then British Museum manuscript, Cotton MS. Tiberius E. X. It contains the History of Richard III by the Master of the Revels, Sir George Buck, written on what appears to be “Revels Office waste,” sometime after 1617 (Chambers, RES 479). Amongst the papers are “four lists of plays, bare lists without any indication of their objects,” which may or may not be all in Buck’s hand (Chambers, RES 479). Chambers believes it “most likely that the lists represent plays which the Revels Office had at some time or times under consideration for performance at court” (RES 484).
The list designated ‘D’ by Chambers (f.247) contains “The Bridegr".
The date to which List D is connected has been much debated in recent criticism, with the leading possibilities being in the range 1615-19. For a summary of the differing views, see Steggle.
Middle Temple records
The Middle Temple archives contain an undated receipt, written on a single sheet of paper:
- recevd of mr baldwine for on Comedy Called the brydgrom & the madmane, presented in the mydell tempell hall before the Iudges, & the benchers, on Candelmas Day last, the some of twelfe pownd, & being at charges for extreordynary mvsikve, for the better Content of thowse reverent persons
toward that Charg recevd more xis, so in all, I Iohn newton have recevd of mr baldwine twelf pownd, xis.
- Iohn newton servant
- to the princ his hightnes
(Orbison, 57).
Orbison observes that the date of the performance referred to is certainly between 1612 and 1619, and gives a number of reasons why the date in question is most likely the Candlemas Day (2 February) of 1618-19.
Lord Chamberlain's List
On 7 August 1641, the Lord Chamberlain issued a list of play titles which were the property of the King's Men, and not to be printed without their consent. On this list appears "The Bridegroome & ye Madma". (Bentley, 5.1297).
Theatrical Provenance
Prince's Men in 1619; King's Men by 1641.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy (per Middle Temple records), with music.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known
References to the Play
None known
Critical Commentary
Bentley (5.1296-7) hesitates over identifying "the Bridegr" as a Prince's Men play, but concludes that it probably is: "No other play title beginning with the letters of the Revels entry is known in the Elizabethan, Jacobean, or Caroline periods". Since Bentley was writing, the connection has been further corroborated by the record printed by Orbison.
For What It's Worth
What kind of plot could one have, featuring both a bridegroom and a madman?
Works Cited
- Chambers, E. K. (review author), “The King’s Office of the Revels, 1610-1622. Fragments of Documents in the Department of Manuscripts, British Museum, transcribed by FRANK MARCHAM, with a Preface by J. P. GILSON. London: Frank Marcham, 53, Chalk Farm Road, N.W.1. Pp. 50, including 19 Collotype Plates. £2. 2s. 1925.” The Review of English Studies, 1.4 (1925): 479-84. Print.
- Marcham, Frank. The King's Office of the Revels 1610-1622: Fragments of Documents in the Department of Manuscripts, British Museum. London: F. Marcham, 1925. Print.
- Orbison, Tucker. "Traces of Two Jacobean Dramatic Performances at the Middle Temple," Yearbook of English Studies 1 (1971): 55-62.
- Steggle, Matthew. "A lost Jacobean tragedy: Henry the Una (c 1619)", Early Theatre 13 (2010): 65-81.
Site created and maintained by David McInnis, University of Melbourne; revised by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University; updated, 17 November 2010.