Florentine Ladies, The
Anon. (unknown date)
Historical Records
Thomas Jordan, "A Prologue to a Play call'd The Florentine Ladies, played in the Night by Gentlemen."
- You're welcome to our Ladies, and I know
- Most courteous Gallants, Ladies will please you;
- Though at this hour, or midnight, else I'le swear
- Most of our Knights are lost with the last year:
- These creatures are of Florence , and not scorn
- To let you know they are Italians born;
- Your Ladies, worthy Gentlemen, 'tis thought
- Love things that are far fetch't and dearly bought:
- Why should not they who of this opinion are
- Let you love Ladies that are come so far;
- It is a question, and they may mistake
- Our Ladies to be Ladies of the Lake;
- Which in our English broadness is a Whore,
- Then what are we, nay they that keep the door;
- What are you too, my Masters? something 'tis
- That make your Wives thus follow you to this.
- A shrew'd suspicion when our wandring Knights
- Arrest strange Ladies, and so late at nights;
- But there's no hurt, for if they please but you,
- We doubt not they'l content your Ladies too.
- Pray take't as 'tis, the best we can afford,
- If we do please, why so. Hab nab's the word.
"The Epilogue, on New-Years-Day at Night".
- With the New Year these Marriages begin,
- Which will be broke e're the next year come in,
- Unless your hands do give us, all our pains
- In Love is lost, if you forbid the banes:
- But if you grant us Licence, and appear
- Each day to see us thorow the whole year;
- Come to our Wedding, to requite your loves,
- Shew us your hands we'l fit you all with Gloves.
Thomas Jordan, A Nursery of Novelties (1665) 16-17.
Theatrical Provenance
Unknown beyond what Jordan says.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy ending in marriage.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known
References to the Play
None known
Critical Commentary
These poems occur in Jordan's collection of mainly occasional writings A Royal Arbor of Loyal Poesie, reissued in 1665 under the title A Nursery of Novelties. Bentley (5.1333) observes, "These titles would suggest an occasional piece by amateurs, but lines 4-8 of the epilogue seem to be more appropriate for professional players… There seems to be no reason to identify The Florentine Ladies with The Florentine Friend".
For What It's Worth
It isn't certain that this describes a pre-1642 play.
Richard Brome's lost The Florentine Friend is discussed here.
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Matthew Steggle, Sheffield Hallam University: updated December 17 2009.