Four Plays in One
Historical Records
Henslowe's Diary
F. 7 (Greg, I.13)
| Res at iiij playes in one the 6 of marche 1591 | ………. | xxxjs vjd |
Theatrical Provenance
Four Plays in One makes its only recorded appearance at the Rose playhouse on 6 March 1592 in the repertory of Lord Strange's players. The absence of Henslowe's enigmatic "ne" with the entry implies that the play was not new.
Probable Genre(s)
Unknown. Harbage was so persuaded that Four Plays in One was a revival of Three Plays in One and therefore also [Second Part of The Seven Deadly Sins| The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins]] that he omits Four Plays in One from the annals of 1592. His guess at the genre of the play ("Moral") is therefore undermined, unless (of course) he is right.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
None known, though F. G. Fleay and W. W. Greg posited a line of narrative and dramatic descent for Four Plays in One by way of Richard Tarlton's lost play, The Seven Deadly Sins. See Critical Commentary, below, for a digest of the scholarly argument.
. F. G. Fleay connected The Seven Deadly Sins to two lost plays called Five Plays in One and Three Plays in One, which were performed by the Queen's players at court in January and February 1585. With the Plot of The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins in mind, Fleay counted the Induction of that Plot as a fourth playlet, which gave him reason to consider Four Plays in One an alternate title for The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins, which he already believed was a play now owned by Strange's players due to the players' names given in the Plot.
References to the Play
<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
Critical Commentary
. F. G. Fleay connected The Seven Deadly Sins to two lost plays called Five Plays in One and Three Plays in One, which were performed by the Queen's players at court in January and February 1585. With the Plot of The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins in mind, Fleay counted the Induction of that Plot as a fourth playlet, which gave him reason to consider Four Plays in One an alternate title for The Second Part of the Seven Deadly Sins, which he already believed was a play now owned by Strange's players due to the players' names given in the Plot.
Greg, (II, Item 13, p. 153)
For What It's Worth
Documentation for a lost play called The Seven Deadly Sins by Richard Tarlton comes from an insult-slinging match between Gabriel Harvey and Thomas Nashe in 1592. Harvey, in the third of Four Letters, mocks Nashe for having given a "botched-vp" treatment of "Sins" subject matter in Pierce Penniless inferior to Tarlton's "famous play of the seaven Deadly sinnes" (EEBO, 29). Nashe retaliated with a tirade claiming that he had not "so vtterly abolished with Tarltons play of the seuen deadly sins, that ther could be nothing said supra of that argument" (McKerrow, I, 304-5). For a fuller treatment of the Harvey-Nashe exchange, see entries for Five Plays in One, Three Plays in One, or The Seven Deadly Sins.
Works Cited
<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu.>
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary:>
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita; updated 26 March 2012.