Longshanks

Historical Records

Henslowe's Diary

y^e 29 of aguste 1595	ne ……….	Res at longe shanke	……….	xxxx^s
y^e 10 of september 1595		Res at longshancke	……….	iij^ll

F. 13 (Greg, I. 25)

y^e 30 of september 1595	……….	Res at longe shancke	……….	xxxij^s
y^e 21 of october 1595	……….	Res at long shancke	……….	xxx^s

F. 14 (Greg, I. 27)

y^e 9 of november 1595	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xxxiij^s
y^e 26 of november 1595	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xviij^s
y^e 10 of desember 1595	……….	Res at prynce longshanke	……….	xxx^s
y^e 29 of desember 1595	……….	Res at longshanckes	……….	xxxij^s

F. 14^v (Greg, I. 28)

y^e 5 of febreary 1595	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xiiij^s
y^e 27 of febreary 1595	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xxx^s

F. 15^v (Greg, I. 30)

y^e 21 of ap^rell 1596	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xiiij^s
y^e 28 of ap^rell 1596	……….	Res at longschancke	……….	xx^s

F. 21^v (Greg, I. 42)

y^e 2 of June 1596	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	iij^ll
y^e 9 of July 1596	……….	Res at longshancke	……….	xv^s

F. 107 (Greg, I. 169)

pd vnto my sone EA for ij bocke called

phillipe of spayne & Longshanckes the 8

of agust 1602 the some of ……………… iiij^ll

Henslowe's Inventory

The booke of the Inventary of the goods of my Lord Admeralles men, taken the 10 of Marche in the yeare 1598. (Greg, Papers, 113)

Gone and loste.

Item, j longe-shanckes sewte.

The Enventorey of all the aparell of the Lord Admeralles men, taken the 13th of Marche 1598, as followeth: (Greg, Papers, 121)

Item, j Longeshankes seute.

Theatrical Provenance

The Admiral's players introduced "Longshanks" in the opening week of their fall season at the Rose playhouse, August 1595. It was the first play of the season to be marked by Henslowe's enigmatic "ne." It received fourteen performances through 9 July 1596, and it returned an average of 31s. per performance to Henslowe. On 8 August 1602 the company purchased the playbook from Edward Alleyn, presumably for revival at the Fortune playhouse. The timing of the purchase suggests that "Longshanks" participated in Alleyn's own return to the stage after retirement in 1597; that return is generally viewed as a marketing strategy for the Fortune, newly built in 1600 and ready for business by the fall of that year.

Probable Genre(s)

History (Harbage)".

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

References to the Play

Critical Commentary

Fleay

Greg

Hook, discussing "Longshanks" in his introduction to Edward I in the Yale edition of Peele's work, considers the lost play "almost certainly" Peele's play (7). His reasoning is that "Longshanks is a name used for no one but Edward I, and no other play is known to have been written about that monarch" (7). He considers the item of apparel listed as both "Gone and loste" and found in Henslowe's inventory ("long-shanckes sewte", "Longeshankes seute") as additional proof, conjecturing that the suit is no ordinary "royal robe" but the "special garment" specified in the opening stage direction for scene 3 in Edward I: Enter … king Edward in his sute of Glasse (7, 93). In a note, Hook cites Collier, Fleay, Greg, and Chambers as the line of authority that the identification of "Longshanks" as "Edward I (with or without revisions) "is widely accepted" (7).

Braunmuller repeats the received wisdom on the identification of "Longshanks" as Peele's Edward I, considering the 1595-6 run as proof of Peele's "play's popularity" (87). In a note, Braunmuller raises but does not engage the issue of Henslowe's designation of "Longshanks" as "ne" (146).

Knutson

Gurr

For What It's Worth

(that lone instance of "The Welshman" in HD.)

Works Cited

Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 15 April 2012.