Panecia: Difference between revisions
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
[[Works Cited|F. G. Fleay, ''BCED'']] has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #330). [[Works Cited|Chambers, ''ES'']] opines that ''Panecia'', which was rehearsed for the Court, "was probably either their play of 26 December ... or that of 1 January 1575, in which there were chimney sweepers" (2.88). | [[Works Cited|F. G. Fleay, ''BCED'']] has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #330). [[Works Cited|Chambers, ''ES'']] opines that ''Panecia'', which was rehearsed for the Court, "was probably either their play of 26 December ... or that of 1 January 1575, in which there were chimney sweepers" (2.88). | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> |
Revision as of 12:41, 19 January 2023
Historical Records
Government Documents
Accounts of the Office of the Revels
14o Decemberis Pervsing and Re-} The expences & charges where my Lord of} forming of plates} Leicesters menne showed theier matter of} Panecia } Item for A dozen ot Lether pointes ............ iiiid Item for iii Torches that night ...................... iiis.
Theatrical Provenance
The only record of performance for Panecia is the Revels Account, in which it is attributed to Leicester's men, who performed both at court, in London, and in the provinces.
Probable Genre(s)
Romance
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
- Information welcome.
References to the Play
Critical Commentary
F. G. Fleay, BCED has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #330). Chambers, ES opines that Panecia, which was rehearsed for the Court, "was probably either their play of 26 December ... or that of 1 January 1575, in which there were chimney sweepers" (2.88).
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson; Last updated by Rlknutson on 28 February 2023 18:06:57