Siege of London, The: Difference between revisions
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 26 of desembʒ 1594 <br> | | y<sup>e</sup> 26 of desembʒ 1594 <br> | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . .<br> | ||
| iij<sup>li</sup> <br> | | iij<sup>li</sup> <br> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 14 of Jenewary 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 14 of Jenewary 1594 | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxviij<sup>s</sup> | | xxviij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 22 of Jenewary 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 22 of Jenewary 1594 | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxxij<sup>s</sup> | | xxxij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of febreary 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 3 of febreary 1594 | ||
| —— | | —— | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxxxv<sup>s</sup> | | xxxxv<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 13 of febreary 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 13 of febreary 1594 | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxix<sup>s</sup> | | xxix<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of marche 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 3 of marche 1594 | ||
| ——— | | ——— | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxvj<sup>s</sup> | | xxvj<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 14 of marche 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 14 of marche 1594 | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xiiij<sup>s</sup> | | xiiij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 30 of aguste 1595 | | y<sup>e</sup> 30 of aguste 1595 | ||
| . . . . . . . | | . . . . . . . | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xviij<sup>s</sup> | | xviij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 20 of septmbʒ 1595 | | y<sup>e</sup> 20 of septmbʒ 1595 | ||
| . . . . . . | | . . . . . . | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xvij<sup>s</sup> | | xvij<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 13 of Jenewary 1595 | | y<sup>e</sup> 13 of Jenewary 1595 | ||
| . . . . . . | | . . . . . . | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xv<sup>s</sup> | | xv<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 14 of June 1596 | | y<sup>e</sup> 14 of June 1596 | ||
| . . . . . . . . . | | . . . . . . . . . | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xxx<sup>s</sup> | | xxx<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 6 of aguste 1596 | | y<sup>e</sup> 6 of aguste 1596 | ||
| | | | ||
| R'' | | R''d'' at seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . . . . | ||
| xv<sup>s</sup> | | xv<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 13:48, 16 January 2021
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
F11 (Greg I.21):
ye 26 of desembʒ 1594
Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . .
iijli
ye 14 of Jenewary 1594 Rd at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . xxviijs ye 22 of Jenewary 1594 Rd at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . xxxijs ye 3 of febreary 1594 —— Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxxvs ye 13 of febreary 1594 Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xxixs
F11v (Greg I.22):
ye 3 of marche 1594 ——— Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvjs ye 14 of marche 1594 Rd at sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiiijs
F12v (Greg I.24):
ye 30 of aguste 1595 . . . . . . . Rd at the seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xviijs
F13 (Greg I.25):
ye 20 of septmbʒ 1595 . . . . . . Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xvijs
F14 (Greg I.27):
ye 13 of Jenewary 1595 . . . . . . Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xvs
F21v (Greg I.42):
ye 14 of June 1596 . . . . . . . . . Rd at the sege of london . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxs ye 6 of aguste 1596 Rd at seage of london . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvs
Inventories
Philip Henslowe's papers in the Dulwich College Library
List of properties
- Under the heading “The Enventary tacken of all the properties for my Lord Admeralles men, the 10 of Marche 1598”:
- Item, j whell and frame in the Sege of London
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's men began a run of "The Siege of London" at the Rose on 26 December 1594 and gave the play another six performances through 14 March 1595. The company continuted the play in the fall season of 1595, giving it another five performances through 6 July 1596.
Probable Genre(s)
History
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
The sources for "The Siege of London" would probably have been the standard English histories including Holinshed's Chronicles. See Critical Commentary below for various scholarly suggestions on which siege the play might have dramatized.
References to the Play
Information welcome.
Critical Commentary
Malone did not guess at the subject matter of the play, nor did Collier. Fleay, BCED is therefore the first to venture an identification; "Fleay-like" (as Wiggins scornfully notes (Catalogue, #862), his solution was reflexively to link the play with 1 Edward IV by Thomas Heywood in that Heywood "founded" scenes 1-7, 9-10, and 15 on "the Admiral's play of The Siege of London, which was an old play of c. 1590, revived 1594, Dec. 26" (BCED 1.288 #13; 2.301 #140). As part of his constructed identification of "The Siege of London," Fleay also constructed a birth narrative that implied a maiden run at the turn of the 1590s with the Admiral's men of 1586-91 .
Greg II thought Fleay's provenance for "The Siege of London" was "very likely" and thus concurred that the siege dramatized in the play was that of the Bastard Falconbridge (#65, P. 173). However, he resisted the implication that "The Siege of London" had simply been stitched into the Heywood play, which he considered "a well-constructed play showing no signs of botching"; he thus thought that any use of old "Siege" play "must have been practically re-written."
Gurr, without acknowledgment of Fleay's suggested provenance, thinks also that "The Siege of London" "may have come from the older Admiral's" (p. 213, #26, n.12).
Wiggins, Catalogue discards the link of "The Siege of London" with Heywood's Edward IV and does not mention an earlier life of the play with an earlier version of the Admiral's men. He thus frees himself from identifying the siege with Falconbridge in 1471. He prefers "one of the periodic sieges by the Danes in pre-Conquest history" (#862), offering a couple of choices, one of which would have linked the play to the roughly contemporary Edmund Ironside. He notes further that none of the sieges are associated with the wheel and frame specified for the play in Henslowe's inventiry of theatrical property.
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 21 October 2020.