Diocletian: Difference between revisions
Line 52: Line 52:
==Works Cited==
==Works Cited==


<List all texts cited throughout the entry, except those staple texts whose full bibliographical details have been provided in the masterlist of Works Cited found on the sidebar menu. Use the coding below to format the list>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> Hunter, George Kirkpatrick. "A Roman Thought: Renaissance Attitudes to History Exemplified in Shakespeare and Jonson." ''An English Miscellany: Presented to W. S. Mackie''. Ed. Brian S. Lee. Cape Town: OUP, 1977. 93-118. </div>


<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em"> citation goes here </div>
[[category:Admiral's]]
 
<If you haven't done so already, also add here any key words that will help categorise this play. Use the following format, repeating as necessary: [[category:example]]>




Site created and maintained by [[Domenico Lovascio]], University of Genoa; updated 02 July 2015.
Site created and maintained by [[Domenico Lovascio]], University of Genoa; updated 02 July 2015.
[[category:all]][[category:Domenico Lovascio]]
[[category:all]][[category:Domenico Lovascio]]

Revision as of 10:13, 2 July 2015

Anon. (1594)


Historical Records

<Reproduce relevant documentary evidence from historical records here. (For example, entries from Henslowe's Diary).>


Theatrical Provenance

Performed as a new play by the Admiral's Men at the Rose on Saturday 16 November 1594. Performed again on Friday 22 November.


Probable Genre(s)

Classical history (?) (Harbage), tragedy (?) (Wiggins).


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

<Enter any information about possible or known sources. Summarise these sources where practical/possible, or provide an excerpt from another scholar's discussion of the subject if available.>


References to the Play

None known.


Critical Commentary

Harbage suggests Thomas Dekker may have been the author of the play. His hypothesis rests on the fact that The Virgin Martyr (1620) by Dekker and Philip Massinger features Diocletian as a character. However, there is no evidence that The Virgin Martyr is a revision of the earlier play.

George Kirkpatrick Hunter (102) argues that the play was presumably a story 'of Christian triumph and pagan wickedness (like Ben Hur and The Sign of the Cross)'.


For What It's Worth

<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>


Works Cited

Hunter, George Kirkpatrick. "A Roman Thought: Renaissance Attitudes to History Exemplified in Shakespeare and Jonson." An English Miscellany: Presented to W. S. Mackie. Ed. Brian S. Lee. Cape Town: OUP, 1977. 93-118.


Site created and maintained by Domenico Lovascio, University of Genoa; updated 02 July 2015.