Estrild: Difference between revisions
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
==Critical Commentary==
==Critical Commentary==


<Summarise any critical commentary that may have been published by scholars. Please maintain an objective tone!>
The context for discussion of "Estrild" by scholars is the anonymous play, ''Locrine,'' initially in regard to Buc's handwritten note on the title page of one copy of the 1595 printing of ''Locrine'' and subsequently in regard to its having been an analogue for, or early version of ''Locrine'' somehow revised into and absorbed by the author of the extant play.
 
'''Collier'''
<br>
 
'''Fleay''' knew of Buc's note, because he quotes Richard Simpson (without citation) as misattributing ''Locrine'' to Charles Tilney, whose name occurs in this matter only in the Buc note(''BECD'', 2.321))
<br>
'''Chambers'''
<br>
'''Greg'''
<br>
'''Maxwell'''
<br>
'''Berek'''
<br>
'''Knutson'''
 




Line 64: Line 80:
==For What It's Worth==
==For What It's Worth==


<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Estrild as a tragic character in ''Mirror for Magistrates'''




Line 71: Line 87:


<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Berek, Peter. "''Locrine'' Revised, ''Selimus,''and Early Responses to ''Tamburlaine''." ''Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama'' 23 (1980): 33-54.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Berek, Peter. "''Locrine'' Revised, ''Selimus,''and Early Responses to ''Tamburlaine''." ''Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama'' 23 (1980): 33-54.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Collier</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Geoffrey of Monmouth. ''The History of the Kings of Britain''. ''Internet Sacred Text Archive'' ([http://sacred-texts.com/index.htm Book II]).</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Geoffrey of Monmouth. ''The History of the Kings of Britain''. ''Internet Sacred Text Archive'' ([http://sacred-texts.com/index.htm Book II]).</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Greg, W. W. "Three Manuscript Notes by Sir George Buc." ''The Library'' 12 (1931): 307-321.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Greg, W. W. "Three Manuscript Notes by Sir George Buc." ''The Library'' 12 (1931): 307-321.</div>

Revision as of 13:15, 11 June 2015

Charles Tilney (c. 1585)


Historical Records

Buc's note

An undated note in the hand of Sir George Buc on the title page of one of five surviving copies of Locrine (printed 1595) reads:

Char. Tilney wrote <a>

Tragedy of this mattr <wch>
hee named Estrild: <& wch>
J think is this. It was l<lost ?>
by his death. & now [?] s<ome ? >
fellow hath published <it.>
J made the dūbe shewes for it.
wch J yet have. G. B<.>.


Locrine, Fondation Martin Bodmer, thumbnail.jpg Locrine Estrild Buc's note, Fondation Martin Bodmer, thumbnail.jpg

Buc signature on the title page of Locrine; reproduced with permission from the Fondation Martin Bodmer, Cologny, Geneve.


Theatrical Provenance

Unknown; information welcome.

Probable Genre(s)

Tragedy


Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

The story would have to be a pseudo-biography of Estrildis, daughter of the King of Germany, in the time of the war between Brute, first king of the Britons, versus Humber, King of the Huns, c. 1115-1075. B.C.E. According to Geoffrey of Monmouth, Estrildis was one of three captives aboard the ship of Humber, which held the spoil of Humber's recent conquests in Germany. Locrine, eldest son of Brute, defeated Humber in battle (Humber fled and drowned in the River Humber). Locrine then pillaged Humber's ships and claimed the girls. It was Estrildis who set him on fire, however: "so fair was she that scarce might any be found to compare with her for beauty, for no polished ivory, nor newly-fallen snow, nor no lilies could surpass the whiteness of her flesh" (Sacred Texts).






(Sacred Texts)

References to the Play

The only surviving reference to "Estrild" is Buc's note (See Historical Records.)


Critical Commentary

The context for discussion of "Estrild" by scholars is the anonymous play, Locrine, initially in regard to Buc's handwritten note on the title page of one copy of the 1595 printing of Locrine and subsequently in regard to its having been an analogue for, or early version of Locrine somehow revised into and absorbed by the author of the extant play.

Collier

Fleay knew of Buc's note, because he quotes Richard Simpson (without citation) as misattributing Locrine to Charles Tilney, whose name occurs in this matter only in the Buc note(BECD, 2.321))
Chambers
Greg
Maxwell
Berek
Knutson



For What It's Worth

Estrild as a tragic character in Mirror for Magistrates'


Works Cited

Berek, Peter. "Locrine Revised, Selimus,and Early Responses to Tamburlaine." Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 23 (1980): 33-54.
Collier
Geoffrey of Monmouth. The History of the Kings of Britain. Internet Sacred Text Archive (Book II).
Greg, W. W. "Three Manuscript Notes by Sir George Buc." The Library 12 (1931): 307-321.
Griffin, Benjamin. "Locrine and the Babington Plot," Notes and Queries 44:1 (1997): 37-40.
Knutson, Roslyn L. "Ur-Plays and Other Exercises in Making Stuff Up." In Lost Plays in Shakespeare's England. Ed. David McInnis and Matthew Steggle. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014. 31-54.
Maxwell, Baldwin. Studies in the Shakespeare Apocrypha. New York: Greenwood Press, 1956.




Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; updated 11 June 2015.