Valentine and Orson (Queen's): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
==Critical Commentary== | ==Critical Commentary== | ||
'''Fleay''' thought that the Admiral's "Valentine and Orson" was "[p]robably founded on the Queen's play" (2.116). | |||
'''Greg''' suggested that the Admiral's Men may have acquired the manuscript of this play, and that their own [[Valentine and Orson (Admiral's)|'''"Valentine and Orson"''']] may have represented a rewriting of the Queen's play by Hathaway and Chettle (2.195). | '''Greg''' suggested that the Admiral's Men may have acquired the manuscript of this play, and that their own [[Valentine and Orson (Admiral's)|'''"Valentine and Orson"''']] may have represented a rewriting of the Queen's play by Hathaway and Chettle (2.195). | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 5 August 2014
Historical Records
Stationers' Register
23 May 1595 (Arber 2.298)
| xxiijo die Maij | ||
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Gosson | Entred for theire Copie an enterlude of VALENTYNE and ORSSON, | |
| Raffe Hancock. | plaid by hir maiesties Players. beinge lycenced vnder the handes of | |
| the Wardens | vjd |
31 March 1600 (Arber 3.159)
| vltimo marcij | ||
|---|---|---|
| […] | ||
| William white. | Entred for his copie in full Court holden this day A famous | |
| history called VALENTINE and ORSSON played by her maiesties | ||
| Players. | vjd |
Theatrical Provenance
Performed by the Queen's Men.
Probable Genre(s)
Romance (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
A prose version of this medieval romance narrative by Henry Watson, The Hystory of the two valyaunte brethren Valentyne and Orson, sonnes vnto the Emperour of Grece was published in 1510 and reprinted in 1555 and 1565. Martin Wiggins summarizes the narrative as follows (3.6):
- The French princess Bellisant gives birth to twin sons in a wood. One of the children is carried off by a bear, while the other is found by King Pepin. Each child is educated by its foster-parent: Valentine is taught all the courtly graces; Orson does not even learn human language. Eventually Orson becomes a wild man who terrorizes the country. Pepin sends Valentine to deal with the problem, and Orson is brought to court. [¶] Pepin sends Valentine and Orson to do battle with a Green Knight who can reputedly only be defeated by a king's son who was not suckled by a woman. In single combat, Valentine can only achieve a draw, but Orson overcomes the Green Knight, sparing his life at Valentine's request. The Green Knight invites them to his castle, where a speaking brazen head tells them that they are brothers, and that Orson may be given the power of speech by cutting a ligament under his tongue.
References to the Play
<List any known or conjectured references to the lost play here.>
Critical Commentary
Fleay thought that the Admiral's "Valentine and Orson" was "[p]robably founded on the Queen's play" (2.116).
Greg suggested that the Admiral's Men may have acquired the manuscript of this play, and that their own "Valentine and Orson" may have represented a rewriting of the Queen's play by Hathaway and Chettle (2.195).
Wiggins observes that the Queen's Men may have been encouraged to stage the brazen head episode in the romance narrative given the use of the same prop in Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay (3.6).
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Works Cited
Wiggins, Martin. British Drama, 1533-1642: A Catalogue. Volume 3: 1590-1597. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013.
Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.