Wonder of a Woman, The: Difference between revisions
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
[[WorksCited|Greg II]], unusually for him, makes connections between "The Wonder of a Woman" and the plays by Marston and Rowley that [[WorksCited|Collier]] and [[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] had resisted. He claims that "Marston borrowed his title" from the Admiral's play, supposing additionally that Marston's "subject may possibly have been the same." He picks up Fleay's comment on Thomas Middleton and Samuel Rowley's ''A new Wonder, or A Woman never vexe'' that it was "clearly altered from an old rhyming play," guessing that the Admiral's play "may have been the original version" (p. 177 #79). | [[WorksCited|Greg II]], unusually for him, makes connections between "The Wonder of a Woman" and the plays by Marston and Rowley that [[WorksCited|Collier]] and [[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] had resisted. He claims that "Marston borrowed his title" from the Admiral's play, supposing additionally that Marston's "subject may possibly have been the same." He picks up Fleay's comment on Thomas Middleton and Samuel Rowley's ''A new Wonder, or A Woman never vexe'' that it was "clearly altered from an old rhyming play," guessing that the Admiral's play "may have been the original version" (p. 177 #79). | ||
'''Gurr''' cites "The Wonder of a Woman" as an example of the "curious financial histories" of some plays in Henslowe's lists of performances (p. 93). His interest in this particular case is the rapid fall-off of receipts from its debut and holiday performance to its returns at what appear its final two performances. | |||
<br><br> | |||
== For What It's Worth == | == For What It's Worth == |
Revision as of 17:11, 17 February 2022
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
- Fol. 13 (Greg I.25)
ye 15 of octobʒ 1595 . . . . . . . . . . ne . . Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . liijs ye 23 of octobʒ 1595 Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxiijs ye 4 of novmbʒ 1595 Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvijs
- Fol. 14 (Greg, I. 27)
ye 20 of novmbʒ 1595 Rd at wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxs ye 4 of desembʒ 1595 Rd at wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiiijs ye 25 of desembʒ 1595 S steuens day Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iijll ijs ye 15 of Jenewary 1595 Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxvijs
- Fol. 14v (Greg, I. 28)
ye 30 of Jenewary 1595 . . . . mr pd . . . Rd at the wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xjs
- Fol. 15v (Greg 1.30):
maye daye 1596 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rd at wonder of a womon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxijs
Theatrical Provenance
The Admiral's men gave "The Wonder of a Woman" nine performances at the Rose playhouse from October 1595 into May 1596 and returned an average of 29s to Philip Henslowe over the run.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy
Harbage
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Information welcome.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
Malone offers no comment on this play (p. 297); Collier, without much enthusiasm, notes that John Marston wrote a play with a similar title (The Wonder of Women, or Sophonisba her Tragedy, 1605) and that William Rowley wrote an even later play, A New Wonder, a Woman never vexed," which was printed in 1632 (p. 58, n1). Fleay, BCED made no connections between this play and others with similar titles (2.304 #173).
Greg II, unusually for him, makes connections between "The Wonder of a Woman" and the plays by Marston and Rowley that Collier and Fleay, BCED had resisted. He claims that "Marston borrowed his title" from the Admiral's play, supposing additionally that Marston's "subject may possibly have been the same." He picks up Fleay's comment on Thomas Middleton and Samuel Rowley's A new Wonder, or A Woman never vexe that it was "clearly altered from an old rhyming play," guessing that the Admiral's play "may have been the original version" (p. 177 #79).
Gurr cites "The Wonder of a Woman" as an example of the "curious financial histories" of some plays in Henslowe's lists of performances (p. 93). His interest in this particular case is the rapid fall-off of receipts from its debut and holiday performance to its returns at what appear its final two performances.
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 8 March 2021.