Set at Maw, The: Difference between revisions
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
<br><br><br> | <br><br><br> | ||
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 13 August 2020. | Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 13 August 2020. | ||
[[category:all]][[category:Rose]][[Category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:duplicate plays]][[category:Update]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Card games]] | [[category:all]][[category:Rose]][[Category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:duplicate plays]][[category:Serial/Sequel plays]][[category:Update]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Card games]] |
Revision as of 15:47, 8 January 2021
Historical Records
Performance Records
Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary
Fol. 10v (Greg, I.20)
ye 14 of decembʒ 1594
. . . ne . . .
Res at the maw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xxxxiiijs
Fol. 11 (Greg, I.21)
ye 2 of Jenewary 1594
. . . . . . . . .
Res at the seat at mawe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xxiiijs
ye 17 of Jenewary 1594
Res at the mawe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xxvs
ye 28 of Jenewary 1594
Res at the mawe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
xxvijs
Theatrical Provenance
"The Set at Maw" belonged to the Admiral's men in the winter of 1594-5, when the company was playing at the Rose. It appears nowhere else in extant theater records.
Probable Genre(s)
Harbage suggested that the play was a comedy.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
See For What It's Worth, below.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
Malone commented that "maw" was a game of cards, and he read the second entry of the play title as "seut, i.e., "suit" (p. 296, n.4). He also identified "The Mack" as a play entitled for a "game at cards" (p. 296, n.5).
Collier agreed about the title of "Set at Maw" as indicating a card game but rejected Malone's reading of the second entry in the manuscript as "seut" (p. 47, n.1). He agreed also that "The Mack" referred to a card game, and he conjectured that it "was perhaps written in consequence of the success of the Maw, already many times represented" (p. 49, n. 3).
Fleay, BCED [#61, 1.132-3) believed that Thomas Dekker's Match me in London (1630) belonged to 1611 and that it was "pretty clearly an alteration of The Set at Maw" because of its play on the language of card games (shuffling, dealing, cutting the cards, turning up a "Court card").
Greg II (#63, p. 172) took seriously Fleay's lumping of "The Set at Maw" with Thomas Dekker's Match me in London on the basis of its allusions to cards and "one specific reference to the game of maw." However, he couldn't find additional evidence to support the connection. He considered evidence of revision in the later play too slight to be persuasive, and he deemed the argument that the "Maw" play could have traveled with Dekker to Queen Anna's men more than a decade later to be irrelevant.
Gurr
For What It's Worth
Ballad, Cassidy, Wiggins
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 13 August 2020.