Constantine: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
<br> | |||
The title suggests a biopic of an historical Constantine, but scholars have differing opinions on which of those is the most likely (see [[#Critical Commentary|Critical Commentary]], below).<br><br><br><br><br> | |||
== References to the Play == | == References to the Play == |
Revision as of 13:50, 7 July 2020
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's "diary")
A single record of performance survives in Henslowe’s accounts for early 1592 (new style):
Res at constantine the 21 of marche 1591 | ………………. | xijs |
Theatrical Provenance
"Constantine" was apparently a feature of the repertory of Lord Strange's men from their offerings prior to the record keeping by Philip Henslowe that survives in the book of accounts popularly known as Henslowe's "diary." The company gave the play a single performance in the stretch from February 19—June 22, 1592.
Probable Genre(s)
History (?)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
The title suggests a biopic of an historical Constantine, but scholars have differing opinions on which of those is the most likely (see Critical Commentary, below).
References to the Play
Critical Commentary
Wiggins names two best-guess Constantines;