French Doctor: Difference between revisions
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of may 1595 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xj<sup>s</sup> | | y<sup>e</sup> 3 of may 1595 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xj<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |||
|} | |||
'''F. 12 <sup>v</sup>''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/1up Greg, I.24]) | |||
: :{| {{table}} | |||
| y<sup>e</sup> 2[3]4 of maye 1595 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxij<sup>s</sup> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 17:07, 15 June 2019
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 10 (Greg I, 19)
ye 18 of octobʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxijs F. 10v (Greg, I.20)
ye 28 of octobʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xvs ye 18 of novmbʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxvijs
ye 3 of Jenewary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxjs ye 30 of Jenewary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xviijs ye 7 of febreary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxjs
ye 24 of febreary 1594 Res at the frensh doctor xxxxxiiijs ye easter mondaye 1595 Res at the ffrenshe doctor liijs ye 3 of may 1595 Res at the frenshe docter xjs
ye 2[3]4 of maye 1595 Res at the frenshe docter xxijs
Theatrical Provenance
The theatrical provenance of "French Doctor" is complicated by the fact that Henslowe did not mark the play "ne" at its debut in his records for the autumn of 1594. Theater historians consequently assume that the play was in revival. But where had it been when new, and with which company?