William the Conqueror: Difference between revisions
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
==Works Cited== | ==Works Cited== | ||
< | <div style="padding-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em">Knutson, Roslyn L. "What's So Special About 1594." ''Shakespeare Quarterly'' 61.4 (2010): 449-467.</div> | ||
Site created and maintained by [[your name]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY. | Site created and maintained by [[your name]], affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY. | ||
[[category:all]][[category:Sussex's]] | [[category:all]][[category:Sussex's]] |
Revision as of 07:25, 12 September 2016
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 8v (Greg, I.16)
In a listing headed as follows:
- "In the name of god Amen begninge the 27 of
- desember 1593 the earle of susex his men
Res at william the conkerer the 4 of Jenewary 1593 [i.e. 1594]. . . ………. xxiis
Theatrical Provenance
Sussex's Men at the Rose Playhouse. The play is not marked "ne".
Probable Genre(s)
Romantic comedy? (Harbage)
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
See below
References to the Play
None known
Critical Commentary
Fleay writes of this play: (BCED, 2.292, 299): "Query Fair Em, retained from L.Strange's Men, like The Jew of Malta." That is to say, he 'lumps' it with the extant play Fair Em, or the Miller's Daughter of Manchester, with the Love of William the Conqueror. Unusually, Fleay's suggestion has met with fairly general acceptance: for instance, Greg, 2.158, and more recently Knutson.
This is sometimes listed as a lost play (e.g. Sibley, 176).
See also Wiggins serial number 903.
For What It's Worth
<Enter any miscellaneous points that may be relevant, but don't fit into the above categories. This is the best place for highly conjectural thoughts.>
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by your name, affiliation; updated DD Month YYYY.