Mamillia: Difference between revisions
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
== Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | == Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues == | ||
[[ | See [[#Critical Commentary|Critical Commentary]], below. | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
== References to the Play == | == References to the Play == | ||
None known. | |||
<br><br> | |||
== Critical Commentary == | == Critical Commentary == | ||
[[Works Cited|F. G. Fleay, ''BCED'']] has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #31). [[Works Cited|Chambers, ''ES'']] offers no opinions, but he does record its performance at court (2.88, 4.89, 147). | :[[Works Cited|F. G. Fleay, ''BCED'']] has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #31). [[Works Cited|Chambers, ''ES'']] offers no opinions, but he does record its performance at court (2.88, 4.89, 147). | ||
[[Works Cited|Wiggings, #550]] does not address the narrative of this play except to dismiss a possible link to Robert Greene's ''Mamillia'', which was printed in 1583 but written earlier. | :[[Works Cited|Wiggings, #550]] does not address the narrative of this play except to dismiss a possible link to Robert Greene's ''Mamillia'', which was printed in 1583 but written earlier. | ||
== For What It's Worth == | == For What It's Worth == |
Latest revision as of 13:03, 28 February 2023
Historical Records
Government Documents
Accounts of the Office of the Revels
Entries from the Revels Accounts for 1573-4 include the following (Feuillerat,Revels p. 193):
{ Predor : & Lucia. played by Therle of Leices- } { ters servauntes vpon Saint stevens daye at nighte } { at whitehall aforesaide/ } { Alkmeon, playde by the Children of Powles on } vj. all fytted and ffur- { Saint Iohns daye at nighte there/ } nyshed with the store { Mamillia. playde by therle of Leicesteres ser- } of thoffice and with the { uauntes on Innosentes daye at nighte there/ } woorkmanshipp and Playes showen { Truth, ffaythfullnesse, & Mercye, playde by } provisions herein at whytehall { the Children of westminster for Elderton vpon } expressed as followeth videlicit { New yeares daye at nighte there/ } hereafter orderly. { Herpetulus the blew knighte & perobia playde by } ffirst the wages and { my Lorde klintons servantes the third of Ianuary } then the Emptions { being the sunday after Newyeares daye there/ } with the other charges { Quintus ffablus playd by the Children of wyndsor } incident { ffor Mr ffarrant on Twelfe daye at nighte lykewise } { at whitehall. }
Theatrical Provenance
As a play in the repertory of Leicester's men, Mamillia would have been performed at the company's urban and provincial venues (most likely) as well as at court.
Probable Genre(s)
Romance
Harbage
Wiggins, Catalogue #550 offers ""Contemporary" as a possible category of genre.
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
See Critical Commentary, below.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
- F. G. Fleay, BCED has no opinion on the narrative source of this play (2.289, #31). Chambers, ES offers no opinions, but he does record its performance at court (2.88, 4.89, 147).
- Wiggings, #550 does not address the narrative of this play except to dismiss a possible link to Robert Greene's Mamillia, which was printed in 1583 but written earlier.
For What It's Worth
Works Cited
Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson; Last updated by Rlknutson on 28 February 2023 18:03:55