Olympio and Eugenio: Difference between revisions
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:


====Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary====
====Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary====
<br>


:Fol. 12<sup>v</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/2up Greg I.24])
:Fol. 12<sup>v</sup> ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/2up Greg I.24])
Line 22: Line 21:
| y<sup>e</sup> 4 of septmbʒ  1595
| y<sup>e</sup> 4 of septmbʒ  1595
| . . . . . . . . . .
| . . . . . . . . . .
| R''d'' at olempeo & hengenyo
| R''es'' at olempeo & hengenyo
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xviij<sup>s</sup>
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xviij<sup>s</sup>
|-
|-
|}
|}


:Fol. 13 ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/2up Greg I.25])
:Fol. 13 ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n84/mode/2up Greg I.25])
Line 34: Line 32:
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of octobʒ  1595
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of octobʒ  1595
| . . . . . . . . . . . .  
| . . . . . . . . . . . .  
| R''d'' at olempeo  
| R''es'' at olempeo  
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv<sup>s</sup>
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv<sup>s</sup>
|-
|-
|}
|}


:Fol. 14 [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n87/mode/1up (Greg, I. 27)]
:Fol. 14 [http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n87/mode/1up (Greg, I. 27)]
Line 46: Line 43:
| y<sup>e</sup> 22 of novmbʒ  1595
| y<sup>e</sup> 22 of novmbʒ  1595
| . . . . . . . . . . .   
| . . . . . . . . . . .   
| R''d'' at olempo  
| R''es'' at olempo  
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiij<sup>s</sup> vj<sup>d</sup>
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiij<sup>s</sup> vj<sup>d</sup>
|-
|-
|}
|}


:Fol. 14<sup>v</sup> [https://archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n88/mode/1up (Greg, I. 28]
:Fol. 14<sup>v</sup> [https://archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n88/mode/1up (Greg, I. 28]
Line 58: Line 54:
| y<sup>e</sup> 18 of febreary  1595
| y<sup>e</sup> 18 of febreary  1595
| . . . . . . . . . . .   
| . . . . . . . . . . .   
| R''d'' at olempeo  
| R''es'' at olempeo  
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  x<sup>s</sup>  
| . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  x<sup>s</sup>  
|-
|-
|}
|}
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 86: Line 81:


== Critical Commentary ==
== Critical Commentary ==
<br>
[[WorksCited|Malone]] considered "Olympio and Eugenio" to be the same play as "Seleo and Olympo," which was introduced on 5 March 1595, declaring that "''Seleo'' ... is in a subsequent entry called ''Olempo and Hengengs''" (p. 296, n.6). He did not therefore list "Olympio and Eugenio" when it first appeared in Henslowe's listings for September 1595.
[[WorksCited|Collier]], at the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," conceded that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, he added that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).


[[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] itemized "Olympio and Eugenio" separately from [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]] (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting the two plays, but he had no comment on its possible narrative.
[[WorksCited|Malone]] considers "Olympio and Eugenio" to be the same play as "Seleo and Olympo," which was introduced on 5 March 1595, declaring that "''Seleo'' ... is in a subsequent entry called ''Olempo and Hengengs''" (p. 296, n.6). He does not therefore list "Olympio and Eugenio" when it first appeared in Henslowe's listings for September 1595.[[category:Edmond Malone]]


[[WorksCited|Collier]], at the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," concedes that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, he adds that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).


[[WorksCited|Greg II (#70, p. 175)]] collapsed the entries in the diary for "Olympio and Eugenio" into those for [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]]. He devoted his entry for the merged pair to a discussion of Fleay's identification of the play/s as an early version of Heywood's ''Golden Age''; he wrestled (as Fleay had not) with the implications of such an identification for the stage history of Heywood's 1611 play, if it had indeed been first performed by the Admiral's men in 1595 under varying titles with some spelling of "Olympo/Olympio."
[[WorksCited|Fleay, ''BCED'']] itemizes "Olympio and Eugenio" separately from [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]] (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting the two plays, but he has no comment on its possible narrative.  [[category:F. G. Fleay]]


[[WorksCited|Greg II (#70, p. 175)]] collapses the entries in the diary for "Olympio and Eugenio" into those for [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]]. He devotes his entry for the merged pair to a discussion of Fleay's identification of the play/s as an early version of Heywood's ''Golden Age''; he wrestles (as Fleay had not) with the implications of such an identification for the stage history of Heywood's 1611 play, if it had indeed been first performed by the Admiral's men in 1595 under varying titles with some spelling of "Olympo/Olympio."


'''Gurr''' combined the entries for [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]] with those for "Olympio and Eugenio," commenting only that the former was "[p]robably the play also named ''Olympio and Eugenio''" (p. 214, n.40).
'''Knutson''' implies acceptance of Greg's re-collapse by citing the pair in a list of plays with similar titles (p. 6).


'''Gurr''' also combines the entries for [[Seleo and Olympo|"Seleo and Olympo"]] with those for "Olympio and Eugenio," explaining that the former was "[p]robably the play also named ''Olympio and Eugenio''" (p. 214, n.40).


[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'', #994, #995]] reflects the inclination of previous theater historians in leaning toward the merger of "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" as a single play. He finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (suggesting it has been staged previously), but he finds troubling the consistency with which Henslowe gave the word common to both titles distinct spelling:s "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one. His serial numbering for the pair reinforces their similitude.
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'', #994, #995]] reflects the inclination of previous theater historians to consider "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" as a single play. He finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (suggesting it has been staged previously), but he makes the point that Henslowe consistently gave the word common to both titles distinct spellings: "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one. His serial numbering for the pair reinforces their similitude.
<br><br>
<br><br>


Line 112: Line 104:
== Works Cited ==
== Works Cited ==


<br>
[[category:all]][[category:Rose]][[Category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:Update]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Duplicate plays]][[category:Possibly corrupt titles]][[category:Plays]]
<br><br>
<br><br>


Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 9 February 2021.
Site created and maintained by [[Roslyn L. Knutson]], Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 9 February 2021.
[[category:all]][[category:Rose]][[Category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:Update]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Duplicate plays]][[category:Possibly corrupt titles]]
[[category:all]][[category:Rose]][[Category:Henslowe's records]][[category:Roslyn L. Knutson]][[category:Update]][[category:Admiral's]][[category:Duplicate plays]][[category:Possibly corrupt titles]]

Latest revision as of 11:56, 20 September 2022

Anon. Play Titles A (1595)Property "Paratext" (as page type) with input value "{{{paratexts}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Contributor" (as page type) with input value "{{{contributors}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.Property "Partnering Institution" (as page type) with input value "{{{partneringInstitutions}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

Historical Records

Performance Records

Playlists in Philip Henslowe's diary

Fol. 12v (Greg I.24)
ye 4 of septmbʒ 1595 . . . . . . . . . . Res at olempeo & hengenyo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xviijs
Fol. 13 (Greg I.25)
ye 3 of octobʒ 1595 . . . . . . . . . . . . Res at olempeo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xvs
Fol. 14 (Greg, I. 27)
ye 22 of novmbʒ 1595 . . . . . . . . . . . Res at olempo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiijs vjd
Fol. 14v (Greg, I. 28
ye 18 of febreary 1595 . . . . . . . . . . . Res at olempeo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xs



Theatrical Provenance

"Olympio and Eugenio" was given sporadic performances by the Admiral's men at the Rose from September 1595 to February 1596.

Probable Genre(s)

Unknown

Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues

Information Welcome.

References to the Play

None known.

Critical Commentary

Malone considers "Olympio and Eugenio" to be the same play as "Seleo and Olympo," which was introduced on 5 March 1595, declaring that "Seleo ... is in a subsequent entry called Olempo and Hengengs" (p. 296, n.6). He does not therefore list "Olympio and Eugenio" when it first appeared in Henslowe's listings for September 1595.

Collier, at the appearance in the playlists of "olempeo and hengenyo," concedes that this "Olempeo" might be "Seleo and Olympo" and that the spelling of the second name might be "Ingenio." Then, letting frustration get the better of editorial restraint, he adds that "it is sometimes hardly possible even to guess, on account of Henslowe's ingeniously corrupt spelling" (p. 56, n.1).

Fleay, BCED itemizes "Olympio and Eugenio" separately from "Seleo and Olympo" (2. #143, p. 301), thereby disconnecting the two plays, but he has no comment on its possible narrative.

Greg II (#70, p. 175) collapses the entries in the diary for "Olympio and Eugenio" into those for "Seleo and Olympo". He devotes his entry for the merged pair to a discussion of Fleay's identification of the play/s as an early version of Heywood's Golden Age; he wrestles (as Fleay had not) with the implications of such an identification for the stage history of Heywood's 1611 play, if it had indeed been first performed by the Admiral's men in 1595 under varying titles with some spelling of "Olympo/Olympio."

Knutson implies acceptance of Greg's re-collapse by citing the pair in a list of plays with similar titles (p. 6).

Gurr also combines the entries for "Seleo and Olympo" with those for "Olympio and Eugenio," explaining that the former was "[p]robably the play also named Olympio and Eugenio" (p. 214, n.40).

Wiggins, Catalogue, #994, #995 reflects the inclination of previous theater historians to consider "Seleo and Olympo" and "Olympio and Eugenio" as a single play. He finds it persuasive that "Olympio and Eugenio," the later of the two play-titles to appear in Henslowe's lists, is not marked "ne" (suggesting it has been staged previously), but he makes the point that Henslowe consistently gave the word common to both titles distinct spellings: "Olympo" for earlier-appearing play and "Olympio" for the later-appearing one. His serial numbering for the pair reinforces their similitude.

For What It's Worth

Information welcome.

Works Cited



Site created and maintained by Roslyn L. Knutson, Professor Emerita, University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 9 February 2021.