Cosmo: Difference between revisions
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
== Critical Commentary == | == Critical Commentary == | ||
[[WorksCited|Greg, II, #25, p. 157]] thought "Cosmo" was "[m]ost probably the same as" the play introduced a week earlier on 7 January and called "th gelyous comodey." He was persuaded to that opinion because "The Jealous Comedy" had been marked with Henslowe's enigmatic "ne," which almost always indicates a new play (or, a play new to the performing company's repertory) but had no apparent additional performances. Hinting at a subject for the play, [[WorksCited|Greg]] suggested that the name of the play "should perhaps be:" "Cosimo." | |||
<br><br> | |||
[[WorksCited|Wiggins, ''Catalogue'', #946]] is tempted but not convinced by the identification of "Cosimo" with "The Jealous Comedy" for Greg's reason of the unusual solo performance of the later "ne" play. | |||
<br><br> | |||
[[WorksCited|Manley and MacLean]]] | |||
== For What It's Worth == | == For What It's Worth == |
Revision as of 13:00, 3 July 2020
(1592)
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's "diary")
Two records of performance survive in Henslowe’s accounts for early 1592 (new style):
Fol. 8/ Greg I, 15
Res at the comodey of cosmo the 12 of Jenewary 1593 | xxxxiiijs | |||||||||||||||
Res at cossmo the 23 of Jeneway 1593 | xxiiijs |
Theatrical Provenance
"Cosmo," also "The Comedy of Cosmo," was performed at the Rose playhouse by Lord Strange's company during the winter season of 1592-3.
Probable Genre(s)
Comedy
Possible Narrative and Dramatic Sources or Analogues
Information welcome.
References to the Play
None known.
Critical Commentary
Greg, II, #25, p. 157 thought "Cosmo" was "[m]ost probably the same as" the play introduced a week earlier on 7 January and called "th gelyous comodey." He was persuaded to that opinion because "The Jealous Comedy" had been marked with Henslowe's enigmatic "ne," which almost always indicates a new play (or, a play new to the performing company's repertory) but had no apparent additional performances. Hinting at a subject for the play, Greg suggested that the name of the play "should perhaps be:" "Cosimo."
Wiggins, Catalogue, #946 is tempted but not convinced by the identification of "Cosimo" with "The Jealous Comedy" for Greg's reason of the unusual solo performance of the later "ne" play.
Manley and MacLean]