French Doctor: Difference between revisions
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<lpd-pre> | <lpd-pre> | ||
:y<sup>e</sup> 18 of octobʒ 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxij<sup>s</sup> | |||
'''F. 10<sup>v</sup>''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n78/mode/2up Greg, I.20]) | '''F. 10<sup>v</sup>''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n78/mode/2up Greg, I.20]) | ||
: | |||
:{| {{table}} | |||
| y<sup>e</sup> 28 of octobʒ 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xv<sup>s</sup> | | y<sup>e</sup> 28 of octobʒ 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xv<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 18 of novmbʒ 1594 | | y<sup>e</sup> 18 of novmbʒ 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxvij<sup>s</sup> | ||
R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxvij<sup>s</sup> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''F. 11''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n81/mode/1up Greg, I.21]) | '''F. 11''' ([http://www.archive.org/stream/henslowesdiary00unkngoog#page/n81/mode/1up Greg, I.21]) | ||
::{| {{table}} | ::{| {{table}} | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 3 of Jenewary 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxj<sup>s</sup> | | y<sup>e</sup> 3 of Jenewary 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxj<sup>s</sup> | ||
Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
| y<sup>e</sup> 7 of febreary 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxj<sup>s</sup> | | y<sup>e</sup> 7 of febreary 1594 R''es'' at the frenshe docter xxj<sup>s</sup> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |||
</lpd-pre> | </lpd-pre> | ||
Revision as of 13:06, 15 June 2019
Historical Records
Performance Records (Henslowe's Diary)
F. 10 (Greg I, 19)
ye 18 of octobʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxijs F. 10v (Greg, I.20)
ye 28 of octobʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xvs |
ye 18 of novmbʒ 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxvijs |
ye 3 of Jenewary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxjs |
ye 30 of Jenewary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xviijs |
ye 7 of febreary 1594 Res at the frenshe docter xxjs |
Theatrical Provenance
The theatrical provenance of "French Doctor" is complicated by the fact that Henslowe did not mark the play "ne" at its debut in his records for the autumn of 1594. Theater historians consequently assume that the play was in revival. But where had it been when new, and with which company?